Second trimester therapeutic cervical cerclage: Which technique is the most appropriate? A retrospective study of 25 cases;Cerclage sur col court au second trimestre: Quelle technique employer? À propos d'une série rétrospective de 25 cerclages

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 640-648

  Perrotin, Frank ^a   Marret, H ^a   Ayeva Derman, M ^a   Alonso, A M ^a   Lansac, J ^a   Body, G ^a  

^a CHU BRETONNEAU   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical cerclage; Cervical incompetence; Premature delivery; Transvaginal sonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MCDONALD TECHNIQUE; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PROPHYLAXIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SHIRODKAR TECHNIQUE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; ULTRASOUND; UTERINE CERVIX CERCLAGE; UTERINE CERVIX INCOMPETENCE;

ADULT; AFTERCARE; CERCLAGE, CERVICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; UTERINE CERVICAL INCOMPETENCE;

EID: 0036856631     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working party on cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 516-23.
2. Gaillard DA, Paradis P, Lallemand AV, Vernet VM, Carquin JS, Chippaux CG, et al. Spontaneous abortions during the second trimester of gestation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993;117:1022-6.
3. Olatunbosun OA, Al-Nuaim L, Turnell RW. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy. Int Surg 1995; 80: 170-4.
4. Benifla JL, Goffinet F, Darai E, Proust A, de Crepy A, Madelenat P. Emergency cervical cerclage after 20 weeks' gestation: A retrospective study of 6 years' practice in 34 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 1997; 12: 274-8.
5. Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, Mazor M, Sorokin Y, Goncalves L, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 956-64.
6. Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: A study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1097-103.
7. Heath VC, Souka AP, Erasmus I, Gibb DM, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: The value of shirodkar suture for the short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 318-22.
8. Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, Berry SM, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, et al. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1325-9.
9. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 830-5.
10. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1106-12.
11. Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or = 15mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1458-67.
12. Berghella V, Daly SF, Tolosa JE, DiVito MM, Chalmers R, Garg N, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: Does cerclage prevent prematurity? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 809-15.
13. Romero R, Gonzalez R, Sepulveda W, Brandt F, Ramirez M, Sorokin Y, et al. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: Prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 1671: 1086-91.
14. Minakami H, Matsubara S, Izumi A, Kosuge S, Watanabe T, Iwasaki R, et al. Emergency cervical cerclage: Relation between its success, preoperative serum level of C-reactive protein and WBC count, and degree of cervical dilatation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999; 47: 157-61.
15. Palaniappan V, Gibb D. Cervical cerclage. Fetal Matern Med Rev 1999; 11: 55-68.
16. Harger JH. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56: 543-8.
17. Andersen HF, Karimi A, Sakala EP, Kalugdan R. Prediction of cervical cerclage outcome by endovaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1102-6.
18. Quinn MJ. Vaginal ultrasound and cervical cerclage: A prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 21: 410-6.
19. Guzman ER, Houlihan C, Vintzileos A, Ivan J, Benito C, Kappy K. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 471-6.
20. Funai EF, Paidas MJ, Rebarber A, O'Neill L, Rosen TJ, Young BK. Change in cervical length after prophylactic cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 117-9.
21. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Bekedam DJ, Hummel P. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): Study design and preliminary results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 823-9.
22. Flint S, Gibb DM. Clinical cerclage. Kurjak A (ed) Texbook of Perinatal Medicine. Vol. 2. London: Parthenon Publishing, 1998: 1375-81.
23. Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O'Neill L, Rebarber A, Paidas MJ, Young BK. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 346-50.
24. Althuisius S, Dekker G, Hummel P, Bekedam D, Kuik D, van Geijn H. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): Effect of therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest only on cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 163-7.
25. Groom KM, Shennan AH, Bennett PR. Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: Outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 445-9.
26. Quinn M. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of "cervical incompetence". Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1953-5.