Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: A prospective five-year study

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 864-869

  Avila, Walkiria ^a   Rossi, Eduardo G ^a   Grinberg, Max ^a   Ramires, José A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; CALCIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEART VALVE STENOSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BRAZIL; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MITRAL VALVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 0036855640     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Born D, Martinez EE, Almeida PAM, et al. Pregnancy in patients with prosthetic heart valves: The effects of anticoagulation on mother, fetus, and neonate. Am Heart J 1992;124:413-417
2. Lutz DJ, Noller KL, Spittell JA, Jr., Danielson GK, Fish CR. Pregnancy and its complications following cardiac valve prostheses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:460-468
3. Shöen FJ, Kujovich JL, Levy RJ, St. John Sutton MG. Bioprosthetic valve failure. Cardiovasc Clin 1988;18:289-317
4. Carpentier A, Lemaigre G, Robert L, Carpentier S, Dobost C. Biological factors affecting long terms results of valvular heterografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;58:467-483
5. Oakley CM. Valvular disease in pregnancy. Curr Opin Cardiol 1996;11:155-159
6. Badduke BR, Jamieson WRE, Miyagishima RT, et al. Pregnancy and childbearing in a population with biologic valvular prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:179-186
7. Deviri E, Levinsky L, Yechezkel M, Levy MJ. Pregnancy after valve replacement with porcine xenograft prosthesis. Gynecol Obstet 1985;160:437-443
8. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A, et al. Pregnancy in patients with a porcine valve bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:1051-1054
9. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Miler DC, Grunkemeier GL, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-935
10. Pomerantzeff PMA, Brandão CMA, Cuduro P, et al. Biopróteses de pericárdio bovino Fisics-Incor: 15 anos. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1997;12:359-366
11. Reul GJ, Cooley DA, Duncan JM, et al. Valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: Analysis of 2680 patients. J Vasc Surg 1985;2:192-204
12. Pelletier LC, Carrier M, Leclerc Y, Dyrda I, Gosselin G. Influence of age on late results of valve replacement with porcine bioprostheses. J Cardiovasc Surg 1982;33:526-533
13. Salazar E, Zajarias A, Gutierrez N, Iturbe I. The problem of cardiac valve prostheses, anticoagulants, and pregnancy. Circulation 1984;70(3 pt. 2):1169-1177
14. Sbarouni E, Oakley CM. Outcome of pregnancy in women with valve prostheses. Br Heart J 1984;71:196-201
15. Brais MP, Bédard P, Goldstein W, Koshal A, Keon WJ. Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: Follow-up of up to 6 years. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:105-111
16. Masters GR, Pipe LA, Bedard PJ, Brais PM, Goldstein GW, Koshal A, Keon JW. Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:81-89
17. Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, Akins CW, Munro AI, Glower DD, Moore KA, Henderson C. Pregnancy and bioprostheses: Influence on structural valve deterioration. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2 Suppl.):S282-S286;discussion S287
18. North RA, Lynn S, Stewart AW, MacCowan LME, Kerr AR, White HD. Long-term survival and valve-related complications in young women with cardiac valve replacements. Circulation 1999;99:2669-2676
19. Salazar E, Espinola N, Romain L, et al. Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Am Heart J 1999;137(4 Pt. 1):714-720
20. Medeiros CCJ, Sbano JCN. Próteses valvares: Morfologia normal e disfunção. Rev Soc Cardiol Estado de São Paulo 1997;7:578-590
21. Campos Fo O, Fischer CH, Machado CV, Cordovil A, Mathias W, Jr., Andrade JL. Refluxos "fisiológicos" detectados ao ecocardiograma transesofágico em pós-operatório de biopróteses mitrais. Arq Bras Cardiol 1997;69(1 suppl.):156-157
22. Melacini P, Villanova C, Thiene G, et al. Long-term echocardiographic Doppler monitoring of Hancock bioprostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1157-1163
23. Hanania G, Thomas D, Michel PL, Garbaz E, Age, C, Millaire A, Acar J. Grossesses chez les porteuses de prothèses valvulaires. Arch Mal Coeur 1994;87:429-437