Strategies in urological reconstruction in myelomeningocele

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 485-490

  González, Ricardo ^a   Schimke, Christa M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b Abteilung für Kinderchirurgie   (Austria)

Author keywords

Artificial urinary sphincter; Bladder augmentation; Incontinence; Myelomeningocele; Urinary diversion

Indexed keywords

ANUS CONTINENCE; APPENDIX; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; BLADDER SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; CHILD; HUMAN; INTESTINE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MENINGOMYELOCELE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SPINA BIFIDA; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE INCONTINENCE; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

CHILD; HUMANS; MENINGOMYELOCELE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY TRACT; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 0036854122     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200211000-00007     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Nomura S, Ishido T, Tanaka K, Komiya A. Augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury or spina bifida. Spinal Cord 2002; 40:30-33.
2. Demirbilek S, Shekarriz B, Upadhay J, et al. Complications of bladder augmentation requiring reoperation. Urology 2000; 55:123-128.
3. González R. Sigmoid cystoplasty. In: Webster, G editor. Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary Diversion. Chicago: Year Book; 1991. p. 88.
4. Arikan N, Turkolmez K, Budak M, Gogus O. Outcome of augmentation sigmoidocystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder. Urol Int 2000; 64:82-85.
5. Kilciler M, Tan O, Tahmaz L, et al. Ureterocystoplasty in bilaterally functional kidneys. Eur Urol 2000; 38:742-747.
6. Badiola FD, Ruiz E, Puigdevall J, et al. Sigmoid cystoplasty with argon beam without mucosa. J Urol 2001; 165:2253-2255. A novel approach for removing the mucosa from the colon for seromuscular augmentation.
7. Lima S, Araujo L, Vilar F, et al. Experience with demucosalized ileum for bladder augmentation. BJU Int 2001; 88:762-764. A description of the technique and outcome for seromuscular ileocystoplasty with an intracavitary balloon.
8. Lima S, Araujo L, Montoro M, et al. The use of demucosalized bowel to augment small contracted bladders. Br J Urol 1998; 82:436-439.
9. Jednak R, Barroso U, Schimke CM, et al. Further experience with seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urotheluim. J Urol 2000; 164:2045-2049.
10. González R, Jednak R, Franc-Guimond J, Schimke C. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium combined with artificial urinary sphincter implantation for the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in myelomeningocele. [Abstract 437]. J Urol 2002; 167 (Suppl. 4):109.
11. Jones J, Bickböller R, Binder J, Kramer W. Synchronous bladder augmentation and living related kidney transplantation. Urologia Internationalis 2001; 67:84-85. A single case description of successful simultaneous ileocystoplasty and renal transplantation.
12. Sheldon CA, González R, Burns M, et al. Renal transplantation into the dysfunctional bladder: The role of adjunctive bladder reconstruction. J Urol 1994; 152:972-975.
13. Stenzl A, Ninkovic M. Restoring voluntary voiding using a latissimus dorsi muscle free flap for bladder reconstruction. Microsurgery 2001; 21:235-240. A novel approach to treat the acontractile bladder.
14. Kryger J, González R, Barthold JS. Surgical management of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic sphincteric incompetence. J Urol 2000; 163:256-263.
15. Lottmann H, Traxer O, Aigrain Y, Melin Y. La voie d'abord rétro-vesicale pour l'implantation du sphincter artificiel AMS 800 chez l'enfant et l'adolescent: Technique et résultats chez huit patients. Ann Urol (Paris) 1999; 33:357-363.
16. Kryger JV, Leverson G, González R. Long term results of artificial urinary sphincters in children are independent of age at implantation. J Urol 2000; 165:2377-2379.
17. Kryger JV, Barthold JS, Fleming P, González R. The outcome of artificial urinary sphincter placement after a mean 15 year follow-up in a pediatric population. BJU Int 1999; 83:1026-1031.
18. Castera R, Podesta M, Ruarte A, et al. 10-Year experience with artificial urinary sphincter in children and adolescents. J Urol 2001; 165:2373-2376. Another detailed report of the long-term results of AUSs.
19. Hafez A, McLorie G, Bagli D, Khoury A. A single-center long-term outcome analysis of artificial urinary sphincter placement in children. BJU Int 2002; 89:82-85. Most recent long-term results of AUS implantation.
20. Holmes NMKB, Baskin LS. Placement of artificial urinary sphincter in children and simultaneous gastrocystoplasty. J Urol 2001; 165:2366-2368.
21. Montague D, Angermeier K. Artificial sphincter trouble shooting. Urology 2001; 58:779-782. An excellent guide to detect problems related to AUSs.
22. Barthold J, Rodríguez E, Freedman A, et al. Results of the rectus fascia sling or wrap procedures for treatment of neurogenic sphincteric incontinence. J Urol 1999; 161:272-274.
23. Nguyen H, Bauer S, Diamond D, Retik A. Rectus fascia sling for the treatment of neurogenic incontinence in boys: Is it safe and effective? J Urol 2001; 166:658-661. Although the authors seem satisfied with the results, only one patient achieved total dryness.
24. Austin P, Westney O, Leng W, et al. Advantages of rectus fascial slings for urinary incontinence in children with neuropathic bladders. J Urol 2001; 165:2369-2372. Among the best outcomes of slings reported to-date.
25. Jawaheer GRL. The Pippi Salle procedure for neurogenic urinary incontinence in childhood: A three-year experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999; 9 (Suppl. 1):9-11.
26. Hayes M, Bulusu A, Terry T, et al. The Pipi Salle urethral lengthening procedure; experience and outcome from three United Kingdom centres. BJU Int 1999; 84:701-705.
27. Guys J, Simeoni-Alias J, Fakhro A, Delarue A. Use of polydimethylsiloxane for endoscopic treatment of neurogenic incontinence in children. J Urol 1999; 162:2133-2135.
28. Diamond D, Bauer S, Retik A, Atala A. Initial experience with the transurethral self-detachable balloon system for urinary incontinence in pediatric patients. J Urol 2000; 164:942-945.
29. Stein R, Fisch M, Ermert A, et al. Urinary diversion and orthotopic bladder substitution in children and young adults with neurogenic bladder: A safe option for treatment? J Urol 2000; 163:568-573.
30. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim M. A novel ureter-ileal reimplantation technique; the serous lined extramural tunnel. J Urol 1994; 151:1193-1197.
31. González R, Zhang G, Sidi A. Urinary undiversion. Experience with 50 patients. Indications, techniques and results. J Urol 1986; 136:13-16.
32. Fisch M, Wammack R, Spies F, et al. Ileocecal valve reconstruction during continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1994; 151:861-865.
33. Hussman O, Cain M. Fecal and urinary continence after ileal cecal cystoplasty for the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 2001; 165:922-925.
34. Hutcheson J, Cooper C, Canning D, et al. The use of vesicostomy as permanent urinary diversion in the child with myelomeningocele. J Urol 2001; 166:2351-2353.
35. Liard A, Séguier-Lipszyc E, Mathiot A, Mitrofanoff P. The Mitrofanoff procedure: 20 Years later. J Urol 2001; 165:2394-2398. A paper of historic significance reporting the 20-year outcome of the Mitrofanoff procedure.
36. Harris C, Cooper C, Hutcheson J, Snyder H III. Appendicovesicostomy: The Mitrofanoff procedure - A 15 year perspective. J Urol 2000; 163:1922-1926.
37. Süser O, Vates T, Freedman A, et al. Results of the Mitrofanoff procedure in urinary tract reconstruction in children. Br J Urol 1997; 79:279-282.
38. Yang W. Yang needle tunneling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms. J Urol 1993; 150:830-834.
39. Monti P, Lara R, Dutra M, Carvalho J. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997; 49:112-115.
40. Narayanaswamy B, Wilcox D, Cuckow P, et al. The Yang-Monti ileovesicostomy: A problematic channel? BJU Int 2001; 87:861-865. A report of differences in the frequency of catheterization problems between Monti and appendix channels.
41. Wedderburn A, Lee R, Denny H, et al. Synchronous bladder reconstruction and antegrade continence enema. J Urol 2001; 165:2392-2393. A strategy for the simultaneous construction of continent cecostomy and Mitrofanoff.
42. Kajbafzadeh A, Chubak N. Simultaneous Malone antegrade continent enema and Mitrofanoff principle using the divided appendix: Report on a new technique for prevention of stoma complications. J Urol 2001; 165:2404-2409. A good technical description of how to divide the appendix for simultaneous Malone and Mitrofanoff channels.
43. Whitehead W, Wald A, Norton N. Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:131-144. Important reading for those treating fecal incontinence.
44. Curry J, Osborne A, Malone P. The MACE procedure: Experience in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34:338-340.