Impact of early endovascular aneurysmal occlusion on outcome of patients in poor grade after subarachnoid haemorrhage: A prospective, consecutive study

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 648-652

  Ross, J ^a   O'Sullivan, M G ^a   Grant, I S ^a   Sellar, R ^a   Whittle, I R ^a  

^a WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; GDC embolisation; Subarachnoid haemorrhage; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM CLIP; ANEURYSM SURGERY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036851766     PISSN: 09675868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/jocn.2002.1100     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Phillips LH II. Wishnant JP. O'Fallon WM. Sundt TM Jr. The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid haemorrhage in a community. Neurology 1980; 30: 1034-1040.
2. Drake CG. Report of the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid haemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 985-986.
3. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; ii: 81-84.
4. Cesarini KG. Improved survival after subarachnoid haemorrhage: Review of case management during a twelve year period. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 664-672.
5. O'Sullivan MG, Sellar R. Statham PF, Whittle IR. Management of poor grade patients after subarachnoid haemorrhage: The importance of neuroradiological findings on clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg 1996; 10: 445-452.
6. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via the endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 8-14.
7. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: A practical scale. Lancet 1975;: i: 480-484.
8. Kassell NF, Peerless FJ, Durward QJ et al. Treatment of ischaemic deficits from vasospasm with intravascular volume expansion and induced arterial hypertension. Neurosurgery 1982; 11: 337-343.
9. Viñuela F, Duckweiler G, Mawad M, Guglielmi detachable coil embolisation of acute intracranial aneurysm: Perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 475-482.
10. Malisch TW, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: Midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 176-183.
11. Eskridge JM, Song JK and participants. Endovascular embolisation of 150 basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: Results of the Food and Drug Administration multicentre clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 81-86.
12. Kuether TA, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: A single centre experience. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 1016-1025.
13. Vanninen R. Koivisto T. Saari T et al. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils - A prospective randomised study. Radiology 1999; 211: 325-336.
14. Byrne JV, Sohn M-J, Molyneux AJ. Five-year experience in using coil embolisation for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 656-663.
15. Lot G. Houdart, Cophignon J, Casaco A, George B. Combined management of intracranial aneurysms by surgical and endovascular treatment. Modalities and results from a series of 395 cases. Acta Neurochir 1999; 141: 557-562.
16. Sturaitis MK, Rinne J, Chaloupka JC, Kaynar M, Lin Z. Awad IA. Impact of Guglielmi detachable coils on outcomes of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by a multidisciplinary team at a single institution. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 569-580.
17. Raftopoulos C, Mathurin P, Boscherini D, Billa RF, Van Boven M, Hantson P. Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolisation is considered the first option. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 175-182.
18. Versari PP, Cenzanto M, Tartara F et al. Introduction of GDC embolisation in the clinical practice as treatment synergical to surgery: Impact on overall outcome of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 2000; 142: 677-684.
19. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T. Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral ancurysms: A prospective randomiscd study. Stroke 2000; 31: 2369-2377.
20. Kremer C, Groden C, Hansen HC, Grzyska U, Zeurner H. Outcome after endovascular treatment of Hunt and Hess grade IV or V aneurysms: Comparison of anterior versus posterior circulation. Stroke 1999; 30: 2617-2622.
21. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Hayley EC, Jane JA, Adams HP. Kongable GL and participants. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery Part I: Overall managcnt results. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 18-36.
22. Bailes JE, Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Baldwin HZ. Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 559-566.
23. Seifert V. Trost HA, Stolke D. Management morbidity and mortality in grade IV and V patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 1990; 103: 5-10.
24. Miyaoka M, Sato K, Ishii S. A clinical study of the relationship of timing to outcome of surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Ncurosurg 1993; 79: 373-378.
25. Nowak G, Schwachenwald R, Arnold H. Early management in poor grade aneurysm patients. Acta Neurochir 1994; 126: 33-37.
26. Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR. Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: A retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 39-49.
27. Rordorf G, Ogilvy CS, Gress DR. Cromwell RM, Choi IS. Patients in poor neurological condition after subarachnoid haemorrhage: Early management and long-term outcome. Acta Neurochir 1997; 139: 1143-1151.
28. Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1998; 42: 959-970.