Size-Dependent recovery of chinook salmon in carcass surveys

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 131, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1194-1202

  Zhou, Shijie ^a  

^a OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE STRUCTURE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMONID;

UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0036851565     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<1194:SDROCS>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allison, P. D. 1999. Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
2. Boechler, J. L., and S. E. Jacobs. 1987. Catch and escapement of fall chinook salmon from Salmon River, Oregon, 1986. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Progress Report, Portland.
3. Caddy, J., and O. Defeo. 1995. Fitting the exponential and logistic surplus yield models with mortality data: some explorations and new perspectives. Fisheries Research 25:39-62.
4. Cornwell, T. J., D. L. Bottom, and K. K. Jones. 2001. Rearing of juvenile salmon in recovering wetlands of the Salmon River estuary. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Information Report 2001-05, Portland.
5. CTC (Chinook Technical Committee). 2001. Annual exploitation rate analysis and model calibration. Pacific Salmon Commission, Joint Chinook Technical Committee, Report TCCHINOOK (01)-2, Vancouver.
6. Fitzpatrick, S., and A. Scott. 1987. Quick simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82: 875-878.
7. Gallucci, V. F., S. B. Saila, D. J. Gustafson, and B. J. Rothschild. 1995. Stock assessment: quantitative methods and applications for small-scale fisheries. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
8. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York.
9. Lewis, M. A. 1998. Stock assessment of anadromous salmonids. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Progress Report 1998, Portland.
10. Long, J. S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
11. Prager, M. H., and M. C. Fabrizio. 1990. Comparison of logistic regression and discriminant analysis for stock identification of anadromous fish, with application to striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and American shad (Alosa sapidissima). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:1570-1577.
12. Quinn, T. J., and R. B. Deriso. 1999. Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Stokes, M. E., C. S. Davis, and G. G. Koch. 2000. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, 2nd edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
14. USCTC (U.S. Chinook Technical Committee). 1997. A review of stock assessment data and procedures for U.S. chinook salmon stocks. Pacific Salmon Commission, U.S. Chinook Technical Committee, Report USTCCHINOOK (97)-1, Vancouver.
15. Williams, R., M. A. Lewis, S. E. Jacobs, and E. D. Schindler. 1990. Exploitation rate indicator stock monitoring: freshwater catch and escapement of the far north Oregon coastal indicator—fallchinook salmon from Salmon River, Oregon, 1989. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Progress Report, Portland.
16. Zhou, S., and R. Williams. 1999. Stock and recruitment analysis and escapement goals for Nehalem River fall chinook. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Information Report 1999-4, Portland.