Central and peripheral interactions in the perception of optic flow

Vision Research

Volumn 42, Issue 26, 2002, Pages 2843-2852

  Habak, Claudine ^a   Casanova, Christian ^a   Faubert, Jocelyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Central vision; Central peripheral interactions; Motion; Optic flow; Peripheral vision; Summation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISIBILITY; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0036848490     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00355-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bardy B.G., Warren W.H., Kay B.A. The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control during walking. Perception and Psychophysics. 61:1999;1356-1368.
2. Berthoz A., Pavard B., Young L.R. Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection). Basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions. Experimental Brain Research. 23:1975;471-489.
3. Brandt Th., Dichgans J., Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision in egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research. 16:1973;476-491.
4. Burr D.C., Morrone M.C., Vaina L.M. Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans. Vision Research. 38:1998;1731-1743.
5. Crowell, Banks Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception and Psychophysics. 53:1993;325-337.
6. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of selectivity to large-field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. 65:1991;1329-1345.
7. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
8. Habak C., Casanova J., Faubert J. Perception of large-extent optic flow stimuli; no effect of age or dot-size scaling. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science. 41:2000;S432.
9. Howard I.P., Heckmann T. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception. 18:1989;657-665.
10. Lestienne F., Shoechting J., Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp. Brain Res. 28:1977;363-384.
11. Mather G., Moulden B. A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: further evidence for a distribution-shift model of direction coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 32:1980;325-333.
12. Mather G., Moulden B. Threshold for movement direction: two directions are less detectable than one. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 35:1983;513-518.
13. Meese T.S., Harris M.G. Broad direction tuning for complex motion mechanisms. Vision Research. 41:2001;1901-1914.
14. Ohmi M., Howard I.P., Landolt J.P. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception. 16:1987;17-22.
15. Palmisano S., Gillam B. Stimulus eccentricity and spatial frequency interact to determine circular vection. Perception. 27:1998;1067-1077.
16. Post R.B. Circular vection is independent of stimulus eccentricity. Perception. 17:1988;737-744.
17. van de Grind, W. A., van Doorrn, A. J., & Koenderink, J. J. (1983). Detection of Coherent Movement in Peripherally-viewed Random-dot Patterns
18. Warren W.H., Kurtz K.J. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 51:1992;443-454.