Special interest radiology improves the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 984-988

  Barry, J D ^a   Edwards, P ^a   Lewis, W G ^a   Dhariwal, D ^a   Thomas, G V ^a  

^a ROYAL GWENT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Gastric cancer surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METASTASIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOMACH CANCER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK;

EID: 0036848005     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/crad.2002.1073     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Coleman MP, Esteve J, Damiecki P, Arslan A, Renard H. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality. IARC Sci Publ 1993;12:193-228.
2. Allum WH, Powell DJ, McConkey CC, Fielding JWL. Gastric cancer: a 25-year review. Br J Surg 1989;76:535-540.
3. Pye JK, Crumplin MKH, Foster ME, Biffin A, Charles J. One-year survey of carcinoma of the oesophagus and stomach in Wales. Br J Surg 2001;88:278-285.
4. Fraser I, Nash R, James DC. Computed tomography in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:249.
5. Cook AO, Levine BA, Sirinek KR, Gaskill HV. Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma: Abdominal computed tomography does not replace celiotomy. Arch Surg 1986;121:603-606.
6. Sussman SK, Halvorsen RA, Illescas FF, Cohan RH, Saeed M, Silverman WM, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging. Radiology 1988;167:335-340.
7. Andaaker L, Morales O, Hojer H, Backstrand B, Borch K, Larsson J. Evaluation of pre-operative computed tomography in gastric malignancy. Surgery 1991;109:132-135.
8. Sikora K. Cancer survival in Britain. BMJ 1999;319:461-462.
9. Vallgren S, Hedenbro J, Gotberg S, Walther B. Preoperative computed tomography for evaluation of tumour growth in patients with gastric cancer. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151:571-573.
10. Botet J, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, Winawer SJ, Urmacher C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991;181:426-432.
11. Maruyama M, Baba M. Gastric carcinoma: radiology of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:1233-1252.
12. Kennedy BJ. The unified international gastric cancer staging classification. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987;22(suppl 133): 11-13.
13. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch eds. UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 5th edn, 1997. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Rohde H, Rau E, Koster R, Gebbensleben B, Stutzer H. A surgeon's checklist for a standardized staging procedure in patients with cancer of the stomach. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987;22(suppl 133): 36-39.
15. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1991.
16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
17. Martin IG. Staging of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Daly JM, Hennessy TPJ, Reynolds JV eds. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1999.
18. Moss AA, Schnyder P, Marks W, Margulis AR. Gastric adenocarcinoma: a comparison of the accuracy and economics of staging by computed tomography and surgery. Gastroenterology 1981;80:45-50.
19. Minani M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, Niki T, Sasaki Y. Gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1992;185:173-178.
20. Ruf G, Kirste G, Grosser G, Wimmer B, Fiedler L. Stellenwert der Computertomographic in der Diagnostik des Magenkrazinoms aus chirurgischer Sich. Aktuel Chir 1985;85:55-60.
21. Davies J, Chalmers AG, Sue-Ling HM, May J, Miller GV, Martin IG, Johnston D. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut 1997;41:314-319.
22. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer M, Felsenberg D, Stein H, Germer C, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1993;34:604-610.
23. Pollack BJ, Chak A, Sivak MV. Endoscopic ultrasonography, Semin Oncol 1996;23:336-346.
24. Watt I, Stewart I, Anderson E, Bell G, Anderson JR. Laparoscopy, ultrasound and computer tomography in cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia: a prospective comparison for detecting intra abdominal metastases. Br J Surg 1989;76:1036-1040.
25. Edwards P, Dhariwal D, Khan S, Barry J, Lewis WG. D2 or not D2? The gastrectomy question. Gut 1999;45:A67.
26. The Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths 1996/1997. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1998.