Augmented-view for restricted visual field: Multiple device implementations

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 79, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 715-723

  Vargas Martín, Fernando ^a   Peli, Eli ^a  

^a LABORATORIO DE ÓPTICA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Field expanders; Glaucoma; Head mounted display; Low vision; Night blindness; Retinitis pigmentosa; Wearable displays

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; PATIENT TREATMENT; PRODUCT DESIGN; VISION AIDS;

VISUAL FIELDS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CAMERA; DEVICE; ERGONOMICS; IMAGE DISPLAY; NIGHT; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SUNLIGHT; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0036847822     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200211000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pagon RA. Retinitis pigmentosa. Surv Ophthalmol 1988;33:137-77.
2. Berson EL. Retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology, 2nd Ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000:2262-90.
3. Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA. Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2803-9.
4. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. Lancet 1999;354:1803-10.
5. Kozlowski JM, Mainster MA, Avila MP. Negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1182-4.
6. Kozlowski JM, Jalkh AE. An improved negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:326.
7. Hoeft WW, Feinbloom W, Brilliant R, Gordon R, Hollander C, Newman J, Novak E, Rosenthal B, Voss E. Amorphic lenses: A mobility aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:142-8.
8. Cohen JM. An overview of enhancement techniques for peripheral field loss. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64:60-70.
9. Krefman RA. Reversed telescopes on visual efficiency scores in fieldrestricted patients. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:159-62.
10. Dickinson C. Low Vision: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
11. Peli E. Augmented vision for central scotoma and peripheral field loss. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000:70-4.
12. Fasce F, Bettin P, Lucà G, Brancato R. Effects of minification on visual performance in advance glaucoma. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000:177-9.
13. Berson EL, Mehaffey L III, Rabin AR. A night vision device as an aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;90:112-6.
14. Berson EL, Rabin AR, Mehaffey L III. Advances in night vision technology: A pocketscope for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;90:427-31.
15. Berson EL, Mehaffey L III, Rabin AR. A night vision pocketscope for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: Design considerations. Arch Ophthalmol 1974;91:495-500.
16. Alaux F, Chauveau N, Bec P, Morucci JP. An electronic visual aid using a luminance amplifier in night vision disorders. J Fr Ophtalmol 1986;9:191-7.
17. Friedburg C, Serey L, Sharpe LT, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Zrenner E. Evaluation of the Night Vision Spectacles on patients with impaired night vision. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:125-36.
18. Marmor MF, Ault C, Shamlian RB. Wide-field high-intensity lantern: An affordable night mobility aid. Ophthalmology 1980;87:216-7.
19. Morrissette DL, Marmor MF, Goodrich GL. An evaluation of night vision mobility aids. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1226-30.
20. Morrissette DL, Goodrich GL. The night vision aid for legally blind people with night blindness: An evaluation. J Visual Impair Blin 1983:67-70.
21. Morrissette DL. The wide angle mobility light: An aid for night blindness. J Visual Impair Blin 1983:393-5.
22. Vargas-Martín F, Peli E. Augmented view for tunnel vision: Device testing by patients in real environments. In: Digest of Technical Papers, SID International Symposium. San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display, 2001:602-5.
23. Peli E. Vision multiplexing: An engineering approach to vision rehabilitation device development. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:304-15.
24. GanNichida T. Short- and long-term effects of HMD use. In: Digest of Technical Papers, SID International Symposium. San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display, 2001:1292-5.
25. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 1998;38:2053-66.
26. Spitzer MB, Aquilino PD, McClelland RW, Olson MH, Rensing NM, DiMarzio CA, Zavracky PM, Lemoncelli A. Optical approaches to incorporation of displays within eyeglasses. J Soc Inform Disp 1998;29:211-2.
27. Melzer JE, Moffitt KW. Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the User. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
28. Burns SA, Webb RH. Optical generation of the visual stimulus. In: Bass M, van Stryland EW, Williams DR, Wolfe WI, eds. The Handbook of Optics, Vol 1, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:1-27.
29. Vargas-Martín F, Peli E. Eye movements with peripheral visual field loss while walking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S858.