Concave pyridines with extended π-systems

European Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn , Issue 21, 2002, Pages 3680-3685

  Storm, Ole ^a   Lüning, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acetylenes; Concave reagents; Macrocycles; Sonogashira coupling; UV spectra

Indexed keywords

ACETYLENE DERIVATIVE; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0036847243     PISSN: 1434193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0690(200211)2002:21<3680::AID-EJOC3680>3.0.CO;2-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. See biochemistry textbooks (e.g., L. Stryer, Biochemistry, 4th Ed., W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995).
2. Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, executive editor J. L. Atwood, chairman of the editorial board J.-M. Lehn, Oxford, Pergamon, 1996ff.
3. J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, 1995.
4. U. Lüning, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 949-955.
5. U. Lüning, R. Baumstark, K. Peters, H. G. von Schnering, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1990, 129-143.
6. U. Lüning, R. Baumstark, M. Müller, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 987-998.
7. U. Lüning, J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 175-182.
8. U. Lüning, R. Baumstark, W. Schyja, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 999-1002.
9. U. Lüning, S. Petersen, W. Schyja, W. Hacker, T. Marquardt, K. Wagner, M. Bolte, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1077-1084.
10. S. Petersen, U. Lüning, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 847-854.
11. H.-J. Schneider, A. Yatsimirsky, Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry, J. Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2000.
12. U. Lüning, M. Gerst, J. Prakt. Chem./Chem.-Ztg. 1992, 334, 656-660.
13. U. Lüning, W. Hacker, J. Prakt. Chem. 1999, 341, 662-667.
14. T. Marquardt, U. Lüning, Chem. Commun. 1997, 1681-1682.
15. U. Lüning, T. Marquardt, J. Prakt. Chem. 1999, 341, 222-227.
16. F. Diederich, P. J. Stang (Ed.), Metal-catalysed Cross-coupling Reactions, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998.
17. H. Takalo, I. Hemmilä, T. Suvela, M. Latva, Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 789-802.
18. E. Jacobson, C. L. Reimer, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1883, 16, 2602-2608.
19. R. Riegel, D. Zwilgmeyer, Org. Synth. 1950, Coll. Vol. 2, 126-128.
20. L. R. Fibel, P. E. Spoerri, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3908-3911.
21. D. G. Markees, G. W. Kidder, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 4130-4135.
22. B. Schmidt, D. H. Ehlert, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3999-4002.
23. E. Koenigs, W. Jaeschke, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1921, 54, 1351-1357.
24. C. Lewis, J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 1861-1868.
25. For a comparison of various synthetic routes to pyridine-2,6-dialdehydes see ref. [5].
26. M. E. Wright, S. R. Pulley, J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1623-1624.
27. M. E. Wright, S. R. Pulley, J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5036-5037.
28. H. Takalo, P. Pasanen, J. Kankare, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B 1988, 42, 373-377.
29. Three sets of signals can be distinguished, only the signals of the most intensive set (ZZ) are given.
30. The assignment of the signals between δ = 20 and δ = 70 ppm may be incorrect, due to intense signal density.
31. R. Graf, J. Prakt. Chem. 1937, 148, 13-23.
32. 3OD in order to dissolve the sample completely, OH could not be detected.
33. W. Mathes, W. Sauermilch, Chem. Ber. 1955, 88, 1276-1283.
34. 2.