Measuring consultation skills in primary care in England: Evaluation and development of content of the MAAS scale

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 52, Issue 484, 2002, Pages 889-893

  Robinson, J ^a   Walley, Tom ^a   Pearson, M ^a   Taylor, D ^a   Barton, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consultation; Doctor patient relationship; Focus groups

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0036843668     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health, July 2000.
2. Haas M. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction: a qualitative study of patients' experiences of surgery for gynaecological cancer. Health Expect 1999; 2: 51-60.
3. Department of Health. Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, September 1999.
4. Grol R. Research and development in quality of care: establishing the research agenda. Qual Health Care 1996; 5: 235-242.
5. Department of Health. Supporting doctors, protecting patients: a consultation paper on preventing, recognising and dealing with poor clinical performance of doctors in the NHS in England. London: Department of Health, November 1999.
6. Tate P, Foulkes J, Neighbour R, et al. Assessing physicians' interpersonal skills via videotaped encounters: a new approach for the Royal College of General Practitioners Membership examination. J Health Comm 1999; 4(2): 143-152.
7. Cox J, Mullholland H. An instrument for assessment of videotapes of general practitioners' performance. BMJ 1993; 306: 1043-1046.
8. Fraser FC, McKinley RK, Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 293-296.
9. Ram P, Grol R, Rethans J, et al. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ 1999; 33: 447-454.
10. McKinley R, Fraser R, van der Vleuten C, Hastings A. Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the Leicester Assessment Package. Med Educ 2000; 34: 573-579.
11. Kurtz SM, Siverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ 1996; 30(2): 83-89.
12. McKinley RK, Fraser RC, Baker R. Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation in clinicians. BMJ 2001; 322: 712-715.
13. Fraser R, McKinley R, Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: establishing the face validity of prioritised criteria in the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 109-113.
14. Holden J, Wearne J. Membership by assessment of performance: developing a method for assessing established general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 231-235.
15. Difford F, Hughes R. Experience of using rating checklists for the assessment of vocational trainees in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 360-364.
16. Kraan H, Crijnen A, van der Vleuten C, Imbos T. Evaluation instruments for medical interviewing skills. In: M. Lipkin, S Putnam, A Lazare (eds). The medical interview: clinical care, education, and research. New York: Springer, 1995.
17. Kraan H, Crijnen A. Amsterdam: Lundbeck, 1986. [Thesis].
18. Chesson R. Low profile, high impact: the role of the sociologist in quality in health care. Qual Health Care 1996; 5: 230-234.
19. Like R, Zyanski S. Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 351-357.
20. Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 480-492.
21. Jung J, van Horne F, Wensing M, et al. Which aspects of general practitioners' behaviour determine patients' evaluations of care? Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1077-1087.
22. Marinker M. From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society, 1997.
23. Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behaviour on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101: 692-696.
24. Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, et al. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ 1991; 303: 1385-1387.
25. Lipkin M, Quill T, Napodano J. The medical interview: a core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 1984; 100: 277-284.
26. Whitehouse C. The teaching of communication skills in United Kingdom medical schools. Med Educ 1991; 25: 211-318.