Anteroposterior axis formation in Xenopus limb bud recombinants: A model of pattern formation during limb regeneration

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 225, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 277-288

  Yokoyama, Hitoshi ^a   Tamura, Koji ^a   Ide, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anteroposterior (AP) axis; Intercalation; Limb; Polar coordinate model; Recombinant limb; Regeneration; X ray irradiation; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 8; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; ONCOPROTEIN; TLX1 PROTEIN, XENOPUS; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN; XENOPUS PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BLASTEMA; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL CONTACT; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO AXIS; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; GENE EXPRESSION; INTERCALATION COMPLEX; LIMB BUD; LIMB REGENERATION; MESENCHYME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; X IRRADIATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ANIMAL; CHIMERA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; LIMB; MESODERM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REGENERATION; TRANSPLANTATION;

XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CHIMERA; EXTREMITIES; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 8; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HEDGEHOG PROTEINS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LIMB BUD; MESODERM; ONCOGENE PROTEINS; REGENERATION; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 0036842028     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.10155     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adler PN, Bryant PJ. 1977. Participation of lethally irradiated imaginal disc tissue in pattern regulation in Drosophila. Dev Biol 60: 298-304.
2. Alberch P, Gale EA. 1983. Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Colchicine-induced digital loss and reduction. J Embryol Exp Morphol 76:177-197.
3. Blanco MJ, Misof BY, Wagner GP. 1998. Heterochronic differences of Hoxa-11 expression in Xenopus fore- and hind limb development: Evidence for lower limb identity of the anuran ankle bones. Dev Genes Evol 208:175-187.
4. Bryant SV, French V, Bryant PJ. 1981. Distal regeneration and symmetry. Science 212:993-1002.
5. Bryant SV, Gardiner DM. 1992. Retinoic acid, local cell-cell interactions, and pattern formation in vertebrate limbs. Dev Biol 152:1-25.
6. Butler EG. 1933. The effects of x-radiation on the regeneration of the fore limb of Amblystoma larvae. J Exp Zool 65:271-315.
7. Cameron J, Fallon JF. 1977. Evidence for polarizing zone in the limb bids of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 55:320-330.
8. Christen B, Slack JMW. 1997. FGF-8 is associated with anteroposterior patterning and limb regeneration in Xenopus. Dev Biol 192: 455-466.
9. Crossley PH, Martin GR. 1995. The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development 121:439-451.
10. Crossley PH, Minowada G, MacArthur CA, Martin GR. 1996. Roles for FGF8 in the induction, initiation, and maintenance of chick limb development. Cell 84:127-136.
11. Dent JN. 1962. Limb regeneration in larvae and metamorphosing individuals of the South African clawed toad. J Morphol 110:61-77.
12. Endo T, Yokoyama H, Tamura K, Ide H. 1997. Shh expression in developing and regenerating limb buds of Xenopus laevis. Dev Dyn 209:227-232.
13. Endo T, Tamura K, Ide H. 2000. Analysis of gene expressions during Xenopus forelimb regeneration. Dev Biol 220:296-306.
14. Faber J. 1971. Vertebrate limb ontogeny and limb regeneration: Morphogenic parallels. Adv Morphog 9:127-147.
15. Gardiner DM, Muneoka M, Bryant SV. 1986. The migration of dermal cells during blastema formation in axolotls. Dev Biol 118:488-493.
16. Hardy A, Richardson MK, Francis-West PH, Rodriguez C, Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Duprez D, Wolpert L. 1995. Gene expression, polarizing activity and skeletal patterning in reaggregated hindlimb mesenchyme. Development 121:4329-4337.
17. Hinchliffe JR, Johnson DR. 1980. Experimental embryology. In: The Development of the Vertebrate Limb. New York: Oxford University Press. p 109-147.
18. Ide H, Wada N, Uchiyama K. 1994. Sorting out of cells from different parts and stages of the chick limb bud. Dev Biol 162:71-76.
19. Iten LE, Bryant SV. 1975. The interaction between the blastema and stump in the establishment of the anterior-posterior and proximodistal organization of the limb regenerate. Dev Biol 44:119-147.
20. MacCabe JM, Saunders JW Jr, Pickett M. 1973. The control of the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes in embryonic chick limbs constructed of dissociated and reaggregated limb bud mesoderm. Dev Biol 31:323-335.
21. MacCaBe JA, Errick J, Saunders JW Jr. 1974. Ectodermal control of the dorsoventral axis in the leg bud of the chick embryo. Dev Biol 39:69-82.
22. Maden M. 1980. Intercalary regulation in the amphibian limb and the rule of distal transformation. J Embryol Exp Morphol 56:201-209.
23. Maden M. 1981. Experiments on anuran limb buds and their significance for principles of vertebrate limb development. J Embryol Exp Morphol 63:243-265.
24. Maden M, Goodwin BC. 1980. Experiments on developing limb buds of the axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum. J Embryol Exp Morphol 57:177-187.
25. Maden M, Wallece H. 1976. How X-rays inhibit amphibian limb regeneration. J Exp Zool 197:105-114.
26. Matsuda H, Yokoyama H, Endo T, Tamura K, Ide H. 2001. Epidermal signal regulates Lmx-1 expression and dorsal-ventral pattern during Xenopus limb regeneration. Dev Biol 229:351-362.
27. Michael MI, Faber J. 1971. Morphogenesis of mesenchyme from regeneration blastemas in the absence of digit formation in Ambystoma mexicanum. Wilhelm Rouxs Arch 168:174-180.
28. Moscona AA. 1952. Cell suspension from organ rudiments of chick embryos. Exp Cell Res 3:535-539.
29. Muneoka K, Bryant SV. 1984a. Cellular contribution to supernumerary limbs in the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev Biol 105:166-178.
30. Muneoka K, Bryant SV. 1984b. Cellular contribution to supernumerary limbs resulting from the interaction between developing and regenerating tissues in the axolotl. Dev Biol 105:179-187.
31. Muneoka K, Murad EHB. 1987. Intercalation and the cellular origin of supernumerary limbs in Xenopus. Development 99:521-526.
32. Muneoka K, Holler-Dinsmore GV, Bryant SV. 1985. A quantitative analysis of regeneration from chimeric limb stumps in the axolotl. J Embryol Exp Morphol 90:1-12.
33. Muneoka K, Holler-Dinsmore G; Bryant SV. 1986. Intrinsic control of regenerative loss in Xenopus laevis limbs. J Exp Zool 240:47-54.
34. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1956. Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
35. Ohuchi H, Yoshioka H, Tanaka A, Kawakami Y, Nohno T, Noji S. 1994. Involvement of androgen-induced growth factor (FGF-8) gene in mouse embryogenesis and morphogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 204:882-888.
36. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer ED, Tabin C. 1993. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75:1401-1416.
37. Riddle RD, Ensini M, Nelson C, Tuchida T, Jessell TM, Tabin C. 1995. Induction of LIM homeobox gene Lmx-1 by WNT7a establishes dorsoventral pattern in the vertebrate limb. Cell 83:631-640.
38. Ros MA, Lyons GE, Mackem S, Fallon JF. 1994. Recombinant limbs as a model to study homeobox gene regulation during limb development. Dev Biol 166:59-72.
39. Roy S, Gardiner DM, Bryant SV. 2000. Vaccinia as a tool for functional analysis in regenerating limbs: Ectopic expression of shh. Dev Biol 218:199-205.
40. Smith JC, Tickle C, Wolpert L. 1978. Attenuation of positional signaling in the chick limb by high doses of γ-radiation. Nature 272: 612-613.
41. Stocum DL. 1975. Regulation after proximal to distal transposition of limb regeneration blastemas and determination of the proximal boundary of the regenerate. Dev Biol 45:112-136.
42. Takeichi M. 1987. Cadherins: A molecular family essential for selective cell-cell adhesion and animal morphogenesis. Trends Genet 3:213-217.
43. Tank PW, Connelly TG, Bookstein FL. 1985. Cellular behavior in the anteroposterior axis of the regenerating forelimb of the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev Biol 109:215-223.
44. Townes PL, Holtfreter J. 1955. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J Exp Zool 128:53-120.
45. Vogel A, Rodriguez C, Warnken W, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 1995. Dorsal cell fate specified by chick Lmx-1 during vertebrate limb development. Nature 378:716-720.
46. Vogel A, Rodriguez C, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 1996. Involvement of FGF-8 in initiation, outgrowth and patterning of the vertebrate limb. Development 122:1737-1750.
47. Wada N, Ide H. 1994. Sorting out of cells in monolayer culture. Int J Dev Biol 38:351-356.
48. Wolfe AD, Nye HLD, Cameron J. 2000. Extent of ossification at the amputation plane is correlated with the decline of blastema formation and regeneration in Xenopus laevis hindlimbs. Dev Dyn 218: 681-697.
49. Wolpert L, Tickle C, Sampford M. 1979. The effect of cell killing by X-irradiatian on pattern formation in the chick limb. J Embyol Exp Morphol 50:175-198.
50. Yajima H, Yonei-Tamura S, Watanabe N, Tamura K, Ide H. 1999. Role of N-cadherin in the sorting-out of mesenchymal cells and in the positional identity along the proximodistal axis of the chick limb bud. Dev Dyn 216:274-284.
51. Yokouchi Y, Sasaki H, Kuroiwa A. 1991 Homeobox gene expression correlated with the bifurcation process of limb cartilage development. Nature 353:443-445.
52. Yokouchi Y, Nakazato S, Yamamoto M, Goto Y, Kameda T, Iba H, Kuroiwa A. 1995. Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. Genes Dev 9:2509-2522.
53. Yokoyama H, Endo T, Tamura K, Yajima H, Ide H. 1998. Multiple digit formation in Xenopus limb bud recombinants. Dev Biol 196: 1-10.
54. Yokoyama H, Yonei-Tamura S, Endo T, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Tamura K, Ide H. 2000. Mesenchyme with fgf-10 expression is responsible for regenerative capacity in Xenopus limb buds. Dev Biol 219:18-29.
55. Yokoyama H, Ide H, Tamura K. 2001. FGF-10 stimulates limb regeneration ability in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 233:72-79.
56. Yoshida K, Urase K, Takahashi J, Ishii Y, Yasugi S. 1996. Mucus-associated antigen in epithelial cells of the chicken digestive tract: Developmental change in expression and implications for morpho-genesis-function relationships. Dev Growth Differ 38:185-192.
57. Zwilling E. 1964. Development of fragmented and dissociated limb bud mesoderm. Dev Biol 39:69-82.