Photogrammetric assessment of the soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 597-603

  Bearn, David R ^a   Sandy, Jonathan R ^a   Shaw, William C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Outcome; Photogrammetry; Unilateral cleft lip and palate

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CLEFT LIP PALATE; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SOFT TISSUE; UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHIN; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FACE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIP; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAXILLA; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NOSE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036840664     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0597:PAOTST>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Anderson B, Semb G, Shaw WC. A six centre international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:409-412.
2. Asher-McDade C, Roberts CT, Shaw WC, Gallagher C. The development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:385-391.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307-310.
4. Brattstrom V. Craniofacial development in cleft lip and palate children related to different treatment regimes. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl. 1991;25:1-31.
5. Brattstrom V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to four different regimes. III. The soft tissue profile at 16-18 years of age. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992a;26:197-202.
6. Brattstrom V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to three different regimes. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992b;26:313-319.
7. Chaisrisookumporn N, Stella JP, Epker BN. Anthropometric profile evaluation of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1995;80:127-136.
8. Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW. A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:7-12.
9. Farkas LG. Accuracy of anthropometric measurements; past, present and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:10-18.
10. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. New York: Raven Press; 1994.
11. Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:346-355.
12. Horswell BB, Holmes AD, Levant BA, Barnett JS. Cephalometric and anthropomorphic observations of Binder's syndrome: A study of 19 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:325-335.
13. Horswell BB, Levant BA. Craniofacial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: Skeletal growth from eight to eighteen years. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:114-121.
14. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:402-408.
15. Michiels G, Sather AH. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9:95-103.
16. Molsted K, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, Mars M, McWilliam J, Plint DA, Prahl-Anderson B, Semb G, Shaw WC, The RPS. A six centre international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:398-404.
17. Morrant DG. A Method of Assessing Surgical Outcome in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Nose Repair Using Standardised Video Records. Manchester, England: University of Manchester; 1992. Thesis.
18. Neger M. A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod. 1959;45:738-751.
19. Roberts CT, Semb G, Shaw WC. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:141-149.
20. Robertson NRE. Contour photography. Br J Orthod. 1976;3:105-109.
21. Ross RB, MacNamera MC. Effect of presurgical infant orthopedics on facial esthetics in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;31:68-73.
22. Saxby PJ, Palmer JH. The use of an independent panel to assess the long term results of cleft lip repair. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39:373-378.
23. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:399-415.
24. Shaw WC, Roberts CT. Semb G. Evaluating treatment alternatives: Measurement and design. In: Turvey TA, Vig KWL, Fonseca RJ, eds. Principles and Management of Facial Clefting Disorders and Craniosynostosis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996.
25. Stoner MM. A photometric analysis of the facial profile: A method of assessing the facial change induced by orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1955;41:453-465.
26. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:313-317.
27. Vegter F, Mulder JW, Hage JJ. Major residual deformities in cleft patients: A new anthropometric approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:106-110.
28. Williams A, Mildenhall S, Sandy J, Murphy T, Beam D, Shaw W. Sell D, Devlan B, Murray J. The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Cleft Lip and Palate Study. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:21-30.
29. Zhu NW, Senewiratne S, Pigott RW. Lip posture and mouth width in children with unilateral cleft lip. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47:301-305.