Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: Comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a phantom model

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 179, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1319-1322

  Maintz, David ^a   Tombach, Bernd ^a   Juergens, Kai Uwe ^a   Weigel, Stefanie ^a   Heindel, Walter ^a   Fischbach, Roman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COBALT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; NITINOL; STEEL; TANTALUM;

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STENOSIS;

EID: 0036839063     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791319     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Prince M, Yucel E, Kaufman J, Harrison D, Geller S. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881
2. Sueyoshi E. Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683-686
3. Link J, Steffens J, Brossmann J, Graessner J. Hackethal S, Heller M. Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. Radiology 1999:212:371-377
4. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 2000;215:670-676
5. Amano Y, Ishihara M, Hayashi H, et al. Metallic artifacts of coronary and iliac arteries stents in MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT. Clin Imaging 1999;23:85-89
6. Lenhart M, Volk M, Manke C, et al. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents. Radiology 2000;217:173-178
7. Maintz D, Kugel H, Schellhammer F, Landwehr A. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Invest Radiol 2001;36:218-224
8. Bartels L, Smits H, Bakker C, Viergever M. MR imaging of vascular stents: effect of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:365-371
9. Maintz D, Fischbach R, Juergens K-U, Allkemper T, Wessling J, Heindel W. Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility. Invest Radiol 2001;36:699-704
10. Hilfiker P, Quick H, Debatin J. Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1999:211:693-697
11. Schulte C, Giesler T, Baum U, et al. A phantom study to validate image acquisition and reconstruction parameters in imaging of coronary stents using multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in vitro. (abstr) Eur Radiol 2001:11:179