Correcting an anterior open-bite side effect during distraction with spring forces

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1476-1484

  Yen, Stephen L K ^a   Gross, John ^a   Yamashita, Dennis Duke ^a   Kim, Tae Ho ^a   McAndrews, James ^a   Shuler, Charles ^a   Reinisch, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BITE; BONE SCREW; CASE REPORT; DEVICE; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; JAW MALFORMATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPLINTING; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0036839023     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200211000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Yen, S., Shang, W., Li, S., Shuler, C., and Yamashita, D. D. Bending the distraction site during mandibular distraction in the rabbit: A model for studying segment control and side effects. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59: 779, 2001.
2. Williams, J. K., Rowe, N. M., and Mackool, R. J. Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part II: Laboratory studies of anteroposterior and superoinferior movements. J. Craniofac. Surg. 9: 504, 1998.
3. Maull, D. J. Review of devices for distraction of the craniofacial complex. Semin. Orthod. 5: 64, 1999.
4. Guerrero, C. A., Bell, W. H., Constasti, G. I., and Rodriguez, A. M. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin. Orthod. 5: 35, 1999.
5. Grayson, B. H., and Santiago, P. E. Treatment planning and biomechanics of distraction osteogenesis from an orthodontic perspective. Semin. Orthod. 5: 9, 1999.
6. Hansen, P. R., and Melugin, M. B. Orthodontic management of the patient undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin. Orthod. 5: 25, 1999.
7. Kunz, C., Hammer, B., and Prein, J. Manipulation of callus after linear distraction: A "lifeboat" or an alternative to multivectorial distraction osteogenesis of the mandible? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 674, 2000.
8. Hoffmeister, B., Marcks, C. H., and Wolff, K. P. Intraoral callus distraction using the floating bone concept. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Baltimore, Maryland, April 23, 1998.
9. Yen, S., Shang, W., Shuler, C., and Yamashita, D. D. Orthodontic spring guidance of bilateral mandibular distraction in rabbits. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 120: 435, 2001.
10. Ilizarov, G. A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: I. The influence of stability on fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin. Orthop. 238: 249, 1989.
11. Ilizarov, G. A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: II. The influence of rate and frequency, of distraction. Clin. Orthop. 239: 263, 1989.
12. Yen, S. L., Gross, J., Wang, P., and Yamashita, D. D. Closure of a large alveolar cleft by bony transport of a posterior segment using orthodontic archwires attached to bone: Report of a case. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59: 688, 2001.
13. Yen, S. Distraction osteogenesis application to dentofacial orthopedics. Semin. Orthod. 3: 275, 1997.
14. Meyer, U., Wiesmann, H. P., Kruse-Loser, B., et al. Strain-related bone remodeling in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103: 800, 1999.
15. Stewart, K. J., Lvoff, G. O., White, S. A., et al. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A comparison of distraction rates in the animal model. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 26: 43, 1998.
16. Booth, P. W. Mandibular advancement using intraoral distraction osteogenesis devices (Abstract) J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 57 (Suppl.): 21, 1999.