Integrating environmental impact assessment with master planning: Lessons from the US Army

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 583-609

  Keysar, Elizabeth ^a   Steinemann, Anne ^b  

^a Army Environmental Policy Institute   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental impact assessment; Master planning; US Army

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY;

INCENTIVES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MILITARY LAND;

UNITED STATES;

NEPA;

EID: 0036838089     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00035-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews RNL. The unfinished business of national environmental policy. In: Clark R, Canter L, editors. Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present and Future. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press, 1997. p. 85-97.
2. Brown AL, Therivel R. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 1999;18(3):183-9.
3. CEQ (Council of Environmental Quality), 1986. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. Federal Register 43: 55994 (November 28, 1978), Federal Register 49: 49750 (December 21, 1984), Federal Register 51: 15625 (April 25, 1986).
4. CEQ (Council of Environmental Quality), 1986. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. Federal Register 43: 55994 (November 28, 1978), Federal Register 49: 49750 (December 21, 1984), Federal Register 51: 15625 (April 25, 1986).
5. CEQ (Council of Environmental Quality), 1986. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. Federal Register 43: 55994 (November 28, 1978), Federal Register 49: 49750 (December 21, 1984), Federal Register 51: 15625 (April 25, 1986).
6. CEQ (Council of Environmental Quality), 1986. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. Federal Register 43: 55994 (November 28, 1978), Federal Register 49: 49750 (December 21, 1984), Federal Register 51: 15625 (April 25, 1986).
7. CEQ (Council of Environmental Quality). The National Environmental Policy Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness After Twenty-Five Years. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 1997.
8. Clark R, Canter L, editors. Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present and Future. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press, 1997.
9. DoD (Department of Defense, Department of the Army). Environmental analysis of army actions; proposed rule. Federal Register 2000;65(174):54347-92.
10. Eccleston CH. The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide With Emphasis on Efficiency. New York: Wiley, 1999.
11. Ensminger JT, McLean RB. Reasons and strategies for more effective NEPA implementation. The Environmental Professional 1993;15(1):46-56.
12. European Commission. SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-making. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia/sea-support.htm; 2001
13. Fogleman VM. Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act: Interpretations, Applications and Compliance. New York: Quorum Books, 1990.
14. HQ Army (Headquarters, Department of the Army). Policy and Guidance for Identifying U.S. Army Environmental Program Requirements. Washington, DC: Office of the Director Environmental Programs, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, 2000.
15. Kreske DL. Environmental Impact Statements. New York: Wiley, 1996.
16. Mandelker DR. NEPA Law and Litigation. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2000 (August 2000 Release).
17. Ortolano L. Controls on project proponents and EIA effectiveness. The Environmental Professional 1993;15(4):352-63.
18. Ortolano L, Shepherd A. Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment 1995;13(1):3-30.
19. Partidário MR. Strategic environmental assessment: key issues emerging from recent practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1996;16(1):31-55.
20. Partidário MR. Elements of an SEA framework: improving the added value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2000;20(6):647-63.
21. Partidário MR, Clark R, editors. Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 2000.
22. Sadler B, Verheem R. Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges and Future Directions (Report no. 53). The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, 1996.
23. Shepherd A, Simm S. The integration of environmental impact assessment with major investment studies for highway planning. Environmental Planning Quarterly 1997;14(2):3-10.
24. Steinemann A. Improving alternatives development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2001;21(1):3-21.
25. Therivel R, Partidário MR, editors. The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London, UK: Earthscan, 1996.
26. US Army. Army Regulation 200-2 Environmental Effects of Army Actions. Available at http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r200_2.pdf of at http://books.usapa.belvoir.army.mil/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/R200_2/CCONTENTS; 1988.
27. US Army. Army Regulation 210-20 Master Planning for Army Installations. Available at http://books. usapa.belvoir.army.mil/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/R210_20/CCONTENTS or at http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r210_20.pdf; 1993.
28. US Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District. Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Army Transformation-Administrative Draft; 2001 (publication pending).
29. Weiner KS. Basic purposes and policies of the NEPA regulations. In: Clark R, Canter L, editors. Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present and Future. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press, 1997.