A sequential analysis of private and social speech in children's dyadic communication

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 110-118

  Girbau, Dolors ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Age differences; Dyads; Private speech; Sequential analysis; Silence; Social speech

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECREATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPAIN; SPEECH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD LANGUAGE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PLAY AND PLAYTHINGS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPAIN; SPEECH;

EID: 0036835263     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1138741600005886     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995b). Log-linear approaches to lagsequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 272-284.
3. Berk, L.E., & Spuhl, S.T. (1995). Maternal interaction, private speech and task performance in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 145-169.
4. Bricker, P.D., Garlock, C.M., Krauss, R.M., & McMahon, L.E. (1977). The role of audible and visible back-channel responses in interpersonal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 295-300.
5. Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (1973). Measuring intelligence with The Culture Fair Tests (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. [Spanish version: Tests de factor «g», Escalas 2 y 3. (1986). Madrid: TEA.]
6. Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (1973). Measuring intelligence with The Culture Fair Tests (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. [Spanish version: Tests de factor «g», Escalas 2 y 3. (1986). Madrid: TEA.]
7. Diaz, R.M. (1986). Issues in the empirical study of private speech: A response to Frawley and Lantotf's commentary. Developmental Psychology, 22, 709-711.
8. Diaz, R.M. (1992). Methodological concerns in the study of private speech. In R.M. Diaz & L.E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 55-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Diaz, R.M., & Berk, L.E. (1992). Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Flavell, J.H. (1966). Le langage privé. Bulletin de Psychologie, 19, 698-701. [Originally presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, San Francisco, November 1964.]
11. Flavell, J.H. (1966). Le langage privé. Bulletin de Psychologie, 19, 698-701. [Originally presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, San Francisco, November 1964.]
12. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
13. Fuson, K.C. (1979). The development of self-regulating aspects of speech: A review. In G. Zivin (Ed.), The development of selfregulation through private speech (pp. 135-217). New York: Wiley.
14. Girbau, D. (1996). Private and social speech in communication: Terminology and distinctive traits. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 507-513.
15. Girbau, D. (1999). El estudio de la comunicacion mediante la metodología observacional. In M.T. Anguera (Ed.), Observatión de la conducta interactiva en contextos naturales: Aplicaciones (pp. 243-268). Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
16. Girbau, D. (2002). Psicología de la comunicación. Barcelona: Ariel.
17. Girbau, D. (in press). Private and social speech in children's dyadic communication in naturalistic context. Anuario de Psicología, 33.
18. Haberman (1978). Analysis of qualitative data (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
19. Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691-736.
20. Krauss, R.M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81-98.
21. Krauss, R.M., & Bricker, P.D. (1967). Effects of transmission delay and access delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society, 41, 286-92.
22. Manning, B.H., White, C.S., & Daugherty, M. (1994). Young children's private speech as a precursor to metacognitive strategy use during task engagement. Discourse Processes, 17, 191-211.
23. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, S. (1979). Clinical use of private speech and critical questions about its study in natural settings. In G. Zivin (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 325-360). New York: Wiley.
24. th ed.). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé. (Original work published 1923.)
25. Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2000). Quantification strategies in behavioral observation research. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 297-315). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
26. st ed., pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
27. nd ed., pp. 855-878). New York: Wiley.
28. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
29. Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of General Psychology. Including the Volume Thinking and Speech. (R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton, Eds.; N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934.)
30. Ward, N., & Tsukahara, W. (2000). Prosodie features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1177-1207.