Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships

Psychological Science

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 557-560

  Levin, Shana ^a   Sinclair, Stacey ^b   Veniegas, Rosemary C ^c   Taylor, Pamela L ^c  

^a CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER GROUP; PREJUDICE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036835225     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00498     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beale, F. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 90-100). New York: New American Library.
2. Benokraitis, N.V., &. Feagin, J.R. (1986). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Coleman, L.M., Jussim, L., & Isaac, J.L. (1991). Black students' reactions to feedback conveyed by White and Black teachers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 460-481.
4. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 504-553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
5. Crosby, F.J., Cordova, D., & Jaskar, K. (1993). On the failure to see oneself as disadvantaged: Cognitive and emotional components. In M.A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 87-104). Hertfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
6. Fiske, S.T., & Stevens, L.E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
8. Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
9. Gutek, B.A., Cohen, A.G., & Tsui, A. (1996). Reactions to perceived sex discrimination. Human Relations, 49, 791-813.
10. Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. King, M. (1975). Oppression and power: The unique status of the black woman in the American political system. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 123-133.
12. Klonoff, E.A., Landrine, H., & Scott, J. (1995). Double jeopardy: Ethnicity and gender in health research. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology (pp. 335-360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Kobrynowicz, D., & Branscombe, N.R. (1997). Who considers themselves victims of discrimination? Individual difference predictors of perceived gender discrimination in women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 347-363.
14. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E.A., Alcaraz, R., Scott, J., & Wilkins, P. (1995). Multiple variables in discrimination. In B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.), The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination (pp. 183-224). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Major, B., Gramzow, R.H., McCoy, S.K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., &. Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
16. McGuire, W.J., & McGuire, C.V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 21. Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs (pp. 97-144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Ransford, H.E. (1980). The prediction of social behavior and attitudes. In V. Jeffries & H. Ransford (Eds.), Social stratification: A multiple hierarchy approach (pp. 265-295). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Reid, P.T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparisons and conflicts. In P.A. Katz & D.A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 203-221). New York: Plenum Press.
19. Reid, P.T., & Comas-Diaz, L. (1990). Gender and ethnicity: Perspectives on dual status. Sex Roles, 22, 397-408.
20. Reid, P.T., & Kelly, E. (1994). Research on women of color: From ignorance to awareness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 477-486.
21. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Sidanius, J., & Veniegas, R.C. (2000). Gender and race discrimination: The interactive nature of disadvantage. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 47-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Smith, A., & Stewart, A.J. (1983). Approaches to studying racism and sexism in Black women's lives. Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 1-15.
24. Swim, J.K., & Stangor, C. (Eds.). (1998). Prejudice: The target's perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Taylor, D.M., Wright, S.C., & Porter, L.E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M.P. Zanna & J.M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1998). Census of population and housing. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Weber, L., & Higginbotham, E. (1997). Black and White professional-managerial women's perceptions of racism and sexism in the workplace. In E. Higginbotham & M. Romero (Eds.), Women and work: Exploring race, ethnicity and class (pp. 153-175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.