Vacuum erection device use in elderly men: A possible severe complication

Journal of the American Board of Family Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 501-502

  Bratton, Robert L ^a   Cassidy, Harvey D ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DEVICE; EMERGENCY WARD; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; MALE; PENIS ERECTION; DRUG CONTRAINDICATION; EQUIPMENT; IMPOTENCE; LIGATION; PENIS PROSTHESIS; VACUUM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSTRICTION; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; IMPOTENCE; MALE; PENILE PROSTHESIS; VACUUM;

EID: 0036834267     PISSN: 08938652     EISSN: 15448770     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Althof SE, Seftel AD. The evaluation and management of erectile dysfunction. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1995;18:171-92 .
2. American Urological Association issues treatment guidelines for erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician 1997;55:1967-8, 1973.
3. Ganem JP, Lucey DT, Janosko EO, Carson CC. Unusual complications of the vacuum erection device. Urology 1998;51:627-31.
4. Dutta TC, Eid JF. Vacuum constriction devices for erectile dysfunction: a long-term, prospective study of patients with mild, moderate, and severe dysfunction. Urology 1999;54:891-3.
5. Lewis RW, Witherington R. External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results. World J Urol 1997;15:78-82.
6. Denil J, Ohl DA, Smythe C. Vacuum erection device in spinal cord injured men: patient and partner satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:750-3.
7. Limoge JP, Olins E, Henderson D, Donatucci CF. Minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in anticoagulated cases: a study of satisfaction and safety. J Urol 1996;155:1276-9.