Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 485-490

  Ellakwa, Ayman E ^a   Shortall, Adrian C ^b   Marquis, Peter M ^b  

^a Tanta University   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; POLYETHYLENE; RESIN; SILANE; WATER; WETTING AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLYGLASS; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; GLASS IONOMER; KEVLAR ARAMID FIBERS; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; POLYMER; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE CEMENT; ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE; ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; IN VITRO STUDY; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STORAGE; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; TENSILE STRENGTH; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; GLASS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENES; POLYMERS; SILANES; SILICATE CEMENT; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WETTING AGENTS;

EID: 0036834192     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129303     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Acrylic resin-fiber composite - Part I: the effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:607-12.
2. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Composition, architecture, and mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites. In: Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ, editors. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1999. p. 20-35.
3. Powell DB, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Strygler H. A comparison of wire-and Kevlar-reinforced provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:81-9.
4. Malquarti G, Berruet RG, Bois D. Prosthetic use of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin for esthetic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:251-7.
5. Solnit GS. The effect of methyl methacrylate reinforcement with silane-treated and untreated glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:310-4.
6. Miller T, Hakimzadeh F, Rudo D. Immediate and indirect woven polyethylene ribbon-reinforced periodontal-prosthetic splint: a case report. Quintessence Int 1995;26:267-71.
7. Ramos V Jr, Runyan DA, Christensen LC. The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:94-6.
8. Larson WR, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA, Clancy JM. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:816-20.
9. Rose RM, Crugnola A, Reis M, Cimino WR, Paul I, Radin EL. On the origins of high in vivo wear rates in polyethylene components of total joint prostheses. Clin Orthop 1979;277-86.
10. Hull D. Fibers and matrices. In: Hull D, Clyne TW, editors. An introduction to composite materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p 9-38.
11. Ellakwa A, Shortall A, Shehata M, Marquis P. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR). Oper Dent 2001;26:467-75.
12. Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Shehata MK, Marquis PM. Influence of bonding agent composition on flexural properties of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite. Oper Dent 2002;27:184-91.
13. Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Shehata, MK, Marquis, PM. The influence of fiber placement and position on the efficiency of reinforcement of fiber reinforced composite bridgework. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:785-91.
14. Smith DC. The non-metallic denture base-recent developments. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1957;8:73-80.
15. Vallittu PK. Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibers and acrylic denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:533-9.
16. Vallittu PK. Acrylic resin-fiber composite - Part II: the effect of polymerization shrinkage of polymethyl methacrylate applied to fiber roving on transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:613-7.
17. Vallittu PK. Comparison of the in vitro fatigue resistance of an acrylic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wires. J Prosthodont 1996;5:115-21.
18. Loewenstein KL. Glass systems. In: Holiday L, editor. Composite materials. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co; 1996. p. 129-287.
19. Grave AM, Chandler HD, Wolfaardt JF. Denture base acrylic reinforced with high modulus fiber. Dent Mater 1985;1:185-7.
20. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Dental adhesives in contemporary restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:567-77.
21. Griffith AA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. London: Philos Trans Roy Soc; 1920. p. 221.
22. Drummond JL, Botsis J, Zaho D, Samyn D. Fracture properties of aged and post-processed dental composites. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:661-6.
23. Vallittu PK. Effect of 180-week water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:334-9.
24. Leinfelder KF. Advances in biorestorative materials. What does the future hold? Interview by Lawrence H. Meskin. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:35-41.