Knowledge and beliefs of nurse researchers about informed consent principles and regulations

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 663-671

  Higgins, Patricia A ^a   Daly, Barbara J ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

informed consent; research ethics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; NURSE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL CONTROL; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS, NURSING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACILITY REGULATION AND CONTROL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NURSES; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036833460     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne559oa     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994: 4-4.
2. Nuremberg Code. In: Levine RJ ed. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1986: 425-426.
3. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 2000. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available at: URL: http://www.wits.ac.za/bioethics/helsinki.htm
4. Moreno J, Caplan AL, Wolpe PR, and Members of the Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. JAMA 1998; 280: 1951-1958.
5. American Geriatrics Society Ethics Committee. Informed consent for research on human subjects with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 1308-1310.
6. Backlar P. Assessing decision-making capacity: a slippery business. Community Ment Health J 1996; 32: 321-325.
7. Hewlett S. Consent to clinical research: adequately voluntary or substantially influenced? J Med Ethics 1996; 22: 232-237.
8. Kruzewski MG. Reconceiving the family: the process of consent in medical decision making. Hastings Cent Rep 1996; 26(2): 30-37.
9. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Protection of human subjects. Code of federal regulations. (Title 45 Public Welfare, Part 46.) Washington, DC: US DHHS, 1991.
10. National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks. Protecting human research subjects. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.
11. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley, 1978.
12. Protecting the privacy of patients’ health information. Summary of the final regulation. Department of Health and Human Services Fact Sheet 2000; (Dec): 1-5.
13. Sugarman J, McCrory DC, Powell D et al. Empirical research on informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1999; 29(1): S1-S42.
14. Davis AJ, Aroskar MA, Liaschenko J, Drought TS. Ethical dilemmas and nursing practice. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1997: 4-4.