Inbreeding and demographic transition in the Orozco Valley (Basque Country, Spain)

American Journal of Human Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 713-720

  Pena J A ^a   Alfonso Sanchez M A ^a   Calderon R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INBREEDING; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE; SPAIN; SPOUSE; TIME;

BIRTH RATE; CONSANGUINITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MORTALITY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RURAL POPULATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPAIN;

EID: 0036828718     PISSN: 10420533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.10085     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alfonso-Sánchez MA, Peña JA, Calderón R. 1997. Consanguinidad y endogamia en una comunidad rural del País Vasco (Lanciego, provincia de Alava). Rev Española Antropol Biol 18:73-91.
2. Alfonso-Sánchez MA, Peña JA, Aresti U, Calderón R. 2001. An insight into recent consanguinity within the Basque area in Spain. Effects of autochthony, industrialisation and demographic changes. Ann of Hum Biol 28:505-521.
3. Alfonso-Sánchez MA, Panera V, Peña JA, Calderón R. 2002. Demographic and health patterns in a rural community from the Basque area in Spain (1800-1990). J Biosoc Sci 34 (in press).
4. Alström CH. 1958. First-cousin marriages in Sweden 1750-1844 and a study of the population movement in some Swedish subpopulations from the genetic-statistical viewpoint. Acta Genet 8:295-369.
5. Barrett R, Kuzawa CW, Mc Dade T, Armelagos GJ. 1998. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: the third epiderniologic transition. Annu Rev Anthropol 27:247-271.
6. Bittles AH. 1998. Empirical estimates of the global prevalence of consanguineous marriage in contemporary societies. Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies (Working Paper Series) 74:1-69.
7. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1998. The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? Trends Ecol Evol 13:266-270.
8. Calderón R. 1989. Consanguinity in the Archbishopric of Toledo, Spain, 1900-1979: types of consanguineous mating in relation to premarital migration and its effects on inbreeding levels. J Biosoc Sci 21:253-266.
9. Calderón R, Peña JA, Morales B, Guevara JI. 1993. Inbreeding patterns in the Basque Country (Alava Province, 1831-1980). Hum Biol 65:743-770.
10. Chesnais JC. 1986. La transition démographique: étapes, formes, implications économiques. Etude de séries temporelles (1720-1984) relatives à 67 pays. Population 6:1059-1070.
11. Conterio F, Moroni A. 1974. Démographie et génétique. Population et Famille 31:63-115
12. Crow JF, Mange AP. 1965. Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. Eugen Q 12:199-203.
13. Czeizel A, Bodnar L, Illei G, Molnar A. 1976. The occurrence of consanguineous marriages in Hungary. Hum Hered 26:110-112.
14. Dahlberg G. 1929. Inbreeding in man. Genetics 14:421-454.
15. Deraemaeker R. 1958. Inbreeding in a north Belgian province. Acta Genet 8:128-136.
16. Etchelecou A. 1991. Transition démographique et système coutumier dans les Pyrénées Occidentales. Population 5:1249-1256.
17. Feeney G. 1994. Fertility decline in East Asia. Science 266:1518-1523.
18. García-Moro C, Hernández M, Moral P, González-Martín A. 2000. Epidemiological transition in Easter Island (1914-1996). Am J Hum Biol 12:371-381.
19. Hajnal J. 1963. Concepts of random mating and the frequency of consanguineous marriages. Proc R Soc Lond 159:125-174.
20. Hotelling H. 1933. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24:417-441
21. Hussain R. 1999. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci 31:449-461.
22. Hussels I. 1969. Genetic structure of Saas, a Swiss isolate. Hum Biol 41:469-479.
23. Jorde L, Pitkänen KJ. 1991. Inbreeding in Finland. Am J Phys Anthropol 84:127-139.
24. Lloyd CB, Ivanov S. 1988. The effects of improved child survival on family planning practice and fertility. Stud Family Plan 19:141-161.
25. Mace R. 1998. The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:389-397.
26. Mason KO. 1997. Explaining fertility transitions. Demography 34:443-454.
27. Moroni A. 1964. Evoluzione della frequenza dei matrimoni consanguinei in Italia negli ultimi 50 anni. Atti Ass Genet Ital 9:207-223.
28. Moroni A. 1967. Andamento della consanguineitá nell'Italia settentrionale negli ultimi quattro secoli. Atti Ass Genet Ital 12:202-222.
29. Morom A, Anelli A, Anghinetti W, Lucchetti E, Rossi O, Siri E. 1972. La consanguineitá, umana nell'isola di Sardegna dal secolo XVIII al'sec. XX. Ateneo Parm 8:69-92.
30. Morales B. 1992. Estructura de la consanguinidad en la Diócesis de Sigüenza-Guadalajara. Variación histórica, microgeográfica y genealógica. PhD thesis. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
31. Notestein F. 1953. Economic problems of population change. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Agricultural Economists. London: Oxford University Press, p 13-31.
32. Omran AR. 1971. The epidemiological transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. Millbank Mem Fund Q 49:509-538.
33. Panse F, Krings J. 1949. Die Häufigkeit der Blutsverwandten-Ehen der katholischen Bevolkerung in der Erzdiözese Köln von 1898-1943. Rhein Vierteljahrblätter 14:138-156.
34. Peña JA. 2001 Estructura genética de la población del Valle de Orozco (País Vasco, España) a partir de diferentes matrices de migración. Antropo 0:1-10. www.didac.ehu.es/antropo
35. Pettener D. 1985. Consanguineous marriages in the Upper Bologna Appenine (1565-1980): microgeographic variations, pedigree structure and correlation of inbreeding secular trend with changes in population size. Hum Biol 57:267-288.
36. Pinto-Cisternas J, Zei G, Moroni A. 1979. Consanguinity in Spain, 1911-1943: general methodology, behavior of demographic variables, and regional differences. Soc Biol 26:55-71.
37. Pinto-Cisternas J, Pineda L, Barrai I. 1985. Estimation of inbreeding by isonymy in Iberoamerican populations: an extension of the method of Crow and Mange. Am J Hum Genet 37:373-385.
38. Saugstad LF. 1977. Inbreeding in Norway. Ann Hum Genet 40:481-491.
39. Spearman CH. 1904. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 15:201-293.
40. Sutter J. 1968. Fréquence de l'endogamie et ses facteurs an XIX siècle. Population 23:303-324.
41. Sutter J, Goux H. 1962. L'evolution de la consanguineité en France de 1926 à 1958 avec donnes récentes detaillés. Population 17:683-704.
42. Sutter J, Tabah L. 1948. Fréquence et repartition des mariages consanguins en France. Population 3:607-623.
43. Sutter J, Tabah L. 1955. L'evolution des isolates de deux departements français: Loir-et-Cher, Finistere. Population 10:654-674.
44. Teitelbaum MS. 1975. Relevance of demographic transition theory for developing countries. Science 188:420-425.
45. Thompson WS. 1929. Population. Am J Sociol 34:959-975.
46. Twiesselmann F, Moureau P, Francois J. 1962. Evolution du taux de consanguinité en Belgique de 1918 à 1959. Population 17:241-266.
47. Varela TA, Lodeiro R, Fariña J. 1997. Evolution of consanguinity in the Archbishopric of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) during 1900-1979. Hum Biol 69:517-531.