Estimates of vertical crustal motion derived from differences of TOPEX/POSEIDON and tide gauge sea level measurements

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 29, Issue 19, 2002, Pages

  Nerem, R S ^a   Mitchum, G T ^b  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAGES; GEODETIC SATELLITES; GEOPHYSICS; LEVEL MEASUREMENT; SEA LEVEL;

CRUSTAL MOTIONS; DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS; GEODETIC TECHNIQUE; GEOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; TIDE GAUGES; TOPEX/POSEIDON; VERTICAL CRUSTAL MOTIONS; VOLCANIC ISLANDS;

TIDE GAGES;

EID: 0036820024     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002GL015037     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Argus, D. F., and, M. B. Heflin, Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the Global Positioning System, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22 (15), 1973-1976, 1995.
2. Argus, D. F., Postglacial rebound from VLBI geodesy: On establishing vertical reference, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 (9), 973-976, 1996.
3. Bawden, G. W., et al., Tectonic contraction across Los Angeles after removal of groundwater pumping effects, Nature, 412, 812-815, 2001.
4. Cazenave, A., et al., Sea level changes from Topex-Poseidon altimetry and tide gauge, and vertical crustal motions from DORIS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 (14), 2077-2080, 1999.
5. Chambers, D. P., et al., On the use of tide gauges to determine altimeter drift, J. Geophys. Res., 103 (C6), 12,885-12,890, 1998.
6. Cheney, R., et al., TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2-cm solution, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,555-24,564, 1994.
7. Christensen, E. J., et al., Calibration of TOPEX/POSEIDON at Platform Harvest, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,465-24,486, 1994.
8. Cohen, S. C., and, J. T. Freymueller, Crustal uplift in the south central Alaska subduction zone: New analysis and interpretation of tide gauge observations, J. Geophys. Res., 106 (B6), 11,259-11,270, 2001.
9. Douglas, B. C., Global sea level rise, J. Geophys. Res., 96 (C4), 6981-6992, 1991.
10. Douglas, B. C., and, W. R. Peltier, The Puzzle of Global Sea-Level Rise, Physics Today, 55 (3), 35-40, 2002.
11. Freymueller, J. T., S. C. Cohen, and, H. J. Fletcher, Spatial variations in present-day deformation, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and their implications, J. Geophys. Res., 105 (B4), 8079-8101, 2000.
12. Fu, L.-L., et al., TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overview, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,369-24,382, 1994.
13. Hayne, G. S., D. W. Hancock, and, C. L. Purdy, TOPEX altimeter range stability estimates from calibration mode data, TOPEX/POSEIDON Research News, 3, 18-22, 1994.
14. Heflin, M., et al., Global Geodesy Using GPS without Fiducial Sites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19 (2), 131-134, 1992.
15. Larson, K. M., and, T. van Dam, Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27 (23), 3925-3928, 2000.
16. Mao, A., C. G. A. Harrison, and, T. H. Dixon, Noise in GPS coordinate time series, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (B2), 2797-2816, 1999.
17. Maul, G. A., and, D. M. Martin, Sea level rise at Key West, Florida, 1846-1992: America's longest instrument record? Geophys. Res. Lett., 20 (18), 1955-1958, 1993.
18. Milne, G. A., et al., Space-geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia, Science, 291 (5512), 2381-2385, 2001.
19. Mitchum, G., A Tide Gauge Network for Altimeter Calibration, in IGS/PSMSL Sea Level Workshop, edited by, R. Neilan, P. Woodworth, and, P. Van Scoy, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 1997.
20. Mitchum, G. T., Comparison of TOPEX sea surface heights and tide gauge sea levels, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,541-24,554, 1994.
21. Mitchum, G. T., Monitoring the Stability of Satellite Altimeters with Tide Gauges, J. Atmos. and Oceanic Tech., 15 (June), 721-730, 1998.
22. Mitchum, G. T., An Improved Calibration of Satellite Altimetric Heights Using Tide Gauge Sea Levels with Adjustment for Land Motion, Marine Geodesy, 23, 145-166, 2000.
23. Morris, C. S., and, S. K. Gill, Evaluation of the TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter system over the Great Lakes, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,527-24,540, 1994.
24. Nerem, R. S., et al., The Use of a Precise Reference Frame for Sea Level Change Studies, in Towards and Integrated Global Geodetic Observing System (IGGOS), edited by, R. Rummel, H. Drewes, W. Bosch, and, H. Hornik, pp. 8-12, Springer-Verlag, Munich, 2000.
25. Sauber, J., S. McClusky, and, R. King, Relation of ongoing deformation rates to the subduction zone process in southern Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett.s, 24 (22), 2853-2856, 1997.
26. Soudarin, L., J.-F. Cretaux, and, A. Cazenave, Vertical crustal motions from the DORIS space-geodesy system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 (9), 1207-1210, 1999.
27. Takeo, M., S. Ide, and, Y. Yoshida, The 1993 Kushiro-Oki, Japan, Earthquake-a High Stress-Drop Event in a Subducting Slab, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20 (23), 2607-2610, 1993.
28. Tapley, B. D., et al., Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12), 24,383-24,404, 1994.
29. Ukawa, M., et al., The 2000 Miyakejima eruption: Crustal deformation and earthquakes observed by the NIED Miyakejima observation network, Earth Planets and Space, 52 (8), Xix-Xxvi, 2000.
30. Wahr, J., T. van Dam, K. Larson, and, O. Francis, Geodetic measurements in Greenland and their implications, J. Geophys. Res., 106 (B8), 16,567-16,581, 2001.
31. Zumberge, J. F., et al., Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, J. Geophys. Res., 102 (B3), 5005-5018, 1997.