Differential charge-transfer cross sections for Na+ with Rb collisions at low energies

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 427011-427018

  Lee, T G ^a   Nguyen, H ^a   Flechard, X ^a,b   DePaola, B D ^a   Lin, C D ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOOPTICAL DEVICES; RUBIDIUM; SEMICONDUCTOR LASERS; SODIUM;

MAGNETOOPTICAL TRAPS;

CHARGE TRANSFER;

EID: 0036818982     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. D. Dowek, I. Reiser, S. Grego, N. Andersen, A. Dubois, J.C. Houver, S.E. Nielsen, C. Richter, J. Salgado, A. Svensson, and J.W. Thomsen, J. Phys. B 35, 705 (2002).
2. J. Perel, R.H. Vernon, and H.L. Daley, Phys. Rev. 138, A937 (1965).
3. V. Aquilanti and G. Bellu, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 1618 (1974).
4. F. von Busch, J. Hormes, and H. Liesen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 34, 244 (1975).
5. R.W.V. Resandt, C. de Vreugd, R. Champion, and J. Los, Chem. Phys. 29, 151 (1978).
6. T. Okamoto, Y. Sato, N. Shimakura, and H. Inouye, J. Phys. B 14, 2379 (1981).
7. M. van der Poel, C.V. Nielsen, M.A. Gearba, and N. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123201 (2001).
8. C.F. Melius and W.A. Goddard, Jr., Phys. Rev. A 10, 1541 (1974).
9. A. Dubious, S.E. Nielsen, and J.P. Hansen, J. Phys. B 26, 705 (1993).
10. S. Nielsen, J.P. Hansen, and A. Dubious, J. Phys. B 28, 5295 (1993).
11. M. Machholm, E. Lewartowski, and C. Courbin, J. Phys. B 27, 4681 (1994).
12. M. Machholm and C. Courbin, J. Phys. B 29, 1079 (1996).
13. X. Flechard, H. Nguyen, E. Wells, I. Ben-Itzhak, and B.D. DePaola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123203 (2001).
14. J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, R. Dörner, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, H. Schmidt-Böcking, and L. Spielberger, J. Phys. B 30, 2917 (1997).
15. R. Dörner, V. Mergel, O. Jagutzki, L. Spielberger, J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, Phys. Rep. 330, 95 (2000).
16. R. Moshammer, M. Unverzagt, W. Schmitt, J. Ullrich, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 108, 425 (1996).
17. An ion-beam energy spread of 1 eV out of 6 kev is sufficient to limit the Q-value resolution to the observed value.
18. X. Flechard, H. Nguyen, S.R. Lundeen, M. Stauffer, H.A. Camp, C.W. Fehrenbach, and B.D. DePaola, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).
19. The excited-state fraction in a MOT has until now, not been easy to characterize. It is known, however, to depend on the detuning and power of the trapping laser, as well as on the alignment of the six laser beams comprising the MOT Clear characterization of the excited-state fraction in a MOT will be the subject of future work.
20. W. Fritsch and C.D. Lin, Phys. Rep. 202, 1 (1991).
21. B.H. Bransden and M.R.C. McDowell, Charge Exchange and Theory of Ion-Atom Collisions, The International Series of Monographs on Physics Vol. 82 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1992).
22. Jiyun Kuang and C.D. Lin, J. Phys. B 29, 1207 (1996).
23. C.E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1971), Vols. I and II.