Comparing transportation project development efficiencies: The California department of transportation and the California county sales tax agencies

Transport Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 347-356

  Hecht , H ^a   Niemeier, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

California audits; Time and cost difficulties; Transportation projects

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036818362     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00024-0     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Californians for Better Transportation, 1995. Final Report of the Transportation Consensus Project. Sacramento: CBT.
2. Deakin, E., 1991. Land use and transportation planning in response to congestion problems: a review and critique. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley. Transportation Research Record 1237, Department of City and Regional Planning.
3. Hartgen, D.T., 1992. Are Highway Conditions Really Getting Worse? Transportation Publication Report. NC, No. 55. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte.
4. Razo, A., Murry, D., 1995. How the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority Succeeded in Implementing the Measure B Highway Improvement Program-Ahead of Schedule and Under Budget, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, San Francisco.
5. Reed, M.F., Luesttich, R.A., Lamm, L.P., 1993. Measuring State Transportation Program Performance. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Washington, DC. NCHRP Report 357.
6. Rutherford, G.S., 1993. Demographic, Technological, and Legislative Changes: their Implications for State DOTs, Washington State Transportation Commission Innovations Unit, Olympia, Washington.
7. SRI International, 1994. Evaluation of The Organizational Structure and Management Practices of the California Department of Transportation. Menlo Park.