Effectiveness of vertical drains in mitigation of liquefaction

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 22, Issue 9-12, 2002, Pages 1059-1065

  Brennan, A J ^a   Madabhushi, S P G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centrifuge; Drains; Liquefaction; Remediation

Indexed keywords

CENTRIFUGATION; DRAINAGE; LIQUEFACTION; PORE PRESSURE; SOILS;

DAMAGING EFFECTS;

EARTHQUAKES;

CENTRIFUGAL MODEL TEST; DRAINAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; LIQUEFACTION; MITIGATION; POREWATER; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL DYNAMICS;

EID: 0036818097     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00131-8     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Sonu C.J. Ito K. Oishi H. Harry Seed, liquefaction and the gravel drain. Civil Engng (NY) 1993;63(12):58-60.
2. Seed H.B. Booker J.R. Stabilisation of potentially liquefiable sand deposits. J Geotechn Div, ASCE 1977;103(7):757-68.
3. Boulanger R.W. Idriss I.M. Stewart D.P. Hashash Y. Schmidt B. Drainage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 75, vol. 1.; 1998. p. 678 and 90.
4. Yasuda S. Ishihara K. Harada K. Sinkawa N. Effect of soil improvement on ground subsidence due to liquefaction. Soils Foundations 1996;99-108. Special issue on the geotechnical aspects of the January, 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake.
5. Kerwin ST, Stone JJ. Liquefaction failure and remediation: King Harbor Redondo Beach, California. J Geotech Geoenviron Div, ASCE 1997;123(8):760-9.
6. Onoue A. Consolidation of multilayered anisotropic soils be vertical drains with well resistance. Soils Foundations 1988;28(3):75-90.
7. Iai S, Koizumi K, Noda S, Tsuchida H, Large scale model tests and analysis of gravel drains. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan; 1988. p. 261-6.
8. Kimura T, Takemura J, Hiro-oka A, Okamura M, Matsuda T. Countermeasures against liquefaction of sand deposits with structures. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Rotterdam: Balkema; 1995. p. 1203-24.
9. Sasaki Y, Taniguchi E, Large scale shaking table tests on the effectiveness of gravel drains for liquefiable sand deposits, vol. 2. Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Southampton, UK, Rotterdam: Balkema; 1982. p. 843-57.
10. Yang TF, Ko H-Y. Reduction of excess pore-water pressure by the gravel drainage method during earthquakes. Centrifuge 98, Rotterdam: Balkema; 1998. p. 301-6.
11. Schofield AN. Dynamics and earthquake geotechnical centrifuge modelling, vol. 3. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake engineering and Soil Dynamics, University of Missouri-Rolla, MO; 1981. p. 1081-100.
12. Brennan AJ. The effectiveness of stone columns as liquefaction remediation at bridge sites. First year research report, University of Cambridge, UK; 2000.
13. Florin VA, Ivanov PL. Liquefaction of saturated sandy soils, vol. 1. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris; 1961. p. 107-11.