Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1187-1194

  Behairy, Yaser M ^a   Harris, William H ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; CHROMIUM; COBALT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REOPERATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 0036816729     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barrack RL, Mulroy RDJ, Harris WH. Improved cementing technique and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74-B: 385-389.
2. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Skutek M, Mikkelsen S, Winemaker M, Robertson D. The Harris Design-2 total hip replacement fixed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-A: 1775-1780.
3. Callaghan JJ, Tooma GS, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: An interim follow-up. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 118-125.
4. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement performed with insertion of the acetabular component with out cement and a Precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81-A: 247-255.
5. Harris WH. Long term results of cemented femoral stems with roughened precoated surfaces. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 137-143.
6. Harris WH, McCarthy JCJ, O'Neill DA. Loosening of the femoral component of total hip replacement after plugging the femoral canal. Hip 1982; 228-238.
7. Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 44-60.
8. Madey SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up [published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 635]. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-A: 53-64.
9. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with so-called second-generation Cementing Technique. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77-A: 1845-1852.
10. Smith SW, Estok DE, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques: An eighteen-year-average follow- up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-A: 1632-1640.
11. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77-A: 1315-1320.
12. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Des Mones W, Johnston RC. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81-A: 481-492.
13. Jasty M, Estok D, Harris WH. The Mechanisms Involved in the Failure of Fixation of Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty 1993; 4: 238-247.
14. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, Haire T, Harris WH. Histomorphorogical studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72-A: 1220-1229.
15. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C et al. Biomechanical and Histologic Investigation of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasties: A study of Autopsy-Retrieved Femurs After In Vivo Cycling. Clin Orthop 1989; 249: 129-140.
16. Davies JP, Harris WH. Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. Orthopedics 1994; 17: 171-172.
17. Park JB, Von Recum AF, Gratzick GE. Pre-coated orthopedic implants with bone cement. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs 1979; 7: 41-53.
18. Raab S, Ahmed AM, Provan JW. Thin film PMMA precoating for improved bone-cement fixation. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 679-704.
19. Harris WH. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement [letter]. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-A: 313-314.
20. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17-27.
21. Russoti GM, Coventry MB, Stauffer RN. Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1988; 235: 141-147.
22. Thomas BJ, Salvati EA, Small RD. The CAD hip arthroplasty. Five to ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68-A: 640-646.
23. Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Charnley versus spectron: Clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of two different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 407-413.
24. Garellick G. On outcome assesment of total hip replacement. Goteborg (SE): Department of Orthopaedics, Goteborg University; 1998. p. 44-58.