Electron spin echo envelope modulation theory for high electron spin systems in weak crystal field

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 117, Issue 13, 2002, Pages 6121-6132

  Astashkin, Andrei V ^a   Raitsimring, Arnold M ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPLEXATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GADOLINIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MANGANESE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METHANOL;

CRYSTAL FIELD; ELECTRON SPIN ECHO ENVELOPE MODULATION; NUCLEAR SPIN;

ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0036805927     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1502651     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. A. Dikanov and A. V. Astashkin, in Advanced EPR; Applications in Biology and Biochemistry, edited by A. J. Hoff (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989), p. 59.
2. S. A. Dikanov and Yu. D. Tsvetkov, Electron Spin Echo Anvelope Modulation (ESEEM) Spectroscopy (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1992).
3. A. Schweiger and G. Jeschke, Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
4. R. B. Clarkson, J. H. Hwang, and R. L. Belford, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 521 (1993).
5. P. Caravan, M. T. Greenfield, X. Li, and A. D. Sherry, Inorg. Chem. 40, 6580 (2001).
6. S. Aime, P. L. Anelli, M. Botta, M. Brochetta, S. Canton, F. Fedeli, E. Gianolino, and E. Terreno, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 7, 58 (2002).
7. E. Strandberg and P.-O. Westlund, J. Magn. Reson A 122, 179 (1996).
8. N. Zaplatin, K. A. Baker, and F. W. Kleinhans, J. Magn. Reson B 110, 249 (1996).
9. A. R. Coffino and J. Peisach, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 3072 (1992).
10. R. J. Larsen and D. J. Singel, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6704 (1993).
11. D. J. Sloop, H.-L. Yu, T.-S. Lin, and S. I. Weissman, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 3746 (1981).
12. T.-S. Lin, Chem. Rev. 84, 1 (1984).
13. G. Jeschke and A. Schweiger, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9979 (1997).
14. K. D. Bowers and J. Owen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 18, 304 (1955).
15. R. T. Ross, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3919 (1965).
16. B. T. Allen, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 3820 (1965).
17. R. W. Wilkins and J. W. Culvahouse, Phys. Rev. B 14, 1830 (1976).
18. X. Tan, M. Bernardo, H. Thomann, and C. P. Scholes, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5147 (1993).
19. 6 at g ∼ 2, then for the relative weights of the EPR transitions used in this work, we can find nominal nutation angles of about 128°, 120°, and 95° for the |-1/2> ↔ |1/2>,|± 1/2> ↔ |±3/2>, and |±3/2> ↔ |± 5/2> transitions, respectively. These angles are not far from the optimum angle of 120°, and even for the |±3/2> ↔ |±5/2> transitions, the ESE intensity will be only 17% less than optimal.
20. E. R. Davies, Phys. Lett. 47A, 1 (1974).
21. R. de Boer, W. de Boer, C. A. van't Hof, and D. van Ormondt, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 29, 1473 (1973).
22. C. Fan, P. E. Doan, C. E. Davoust, and B. M. Hoffman, J. Mater. Res. 98, 62 (1992).
23. ± operators for the S = 1/2 system with anisotropic g factor.
24. W. B. Mims, Phys. Rev. B 5, 2409 (1972).
25. D. J. Singel, W. A. J. A. van der Poel, J. Schmidt, J. H. van der Waals, and R. de Beer, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5453 (1984).
26. C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer, Berlin, 1996).