An optimality criterion to determine areas of endemism

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 806-816

  Szumik, Claudia A ^a,b   Cuezzo, Fabiana ^b   Goloboff, Pablo A ^a,b   Chalup, Adriana E ^b  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^b Instituto Superior de Entomología INSUE CONICET   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Endemicity; Optimality criterion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036804526     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102483     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allard, M., J. Farris, and J. Carpenter. 1999. Congruence among mammalian mitochondrial genes. Cladistics 15:75-84.
2. Brooks, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution: Methodological and theoretical update. Syst. Biol. 39:14-30.
3. Faith, D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61:1-10.
4. Goloboff, P. A. 2001. NDM and VNDM: Programs for Analysis of Endemicity. Distributed by the author, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
5. Goloboff, P. A. 2002. Optimization of polytomies: State set and parallel operations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:269-275.
6. Harold, A. S., and R. D. Mooi. 1994. Areas of endemism: Definition and recognition criteria. Syst. Biol. 43:261-266.
7. Linder, P. 2001. On areas of endemism, with an example from the African Restionaceae. Syst. Biol. 50:892-912.
8. Moilanen, A. 1999. Searching for most parsimonious trees with simulated evolutionary optimization. Cladistics 15:39-50.
9. Morrone, J. J. 1994. On the identification of areas of endemism. Syst. Biol. 43:438-441.
10. Nelson, G., and P. Ladiges. 1996. Paralogy in cladistic biogeography and analysis of paralogy-free subtree. Am. Mus. Novit. 3167:1-58.
11. Nelson, G., and N. I. Platnick. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
12. Page, R. D. M. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Syst. Biol. 43:58-77.
13. Platnick, N. I. 1991. On areas of endemism. Aust. Syst. Bot. 4:xi-xii.
14. Platnick, N. I. 1992. Patterns of biodiversity. Pages 15-24 in Systematics, Ecology, and the Biodiversity Crisis (N. Eldredge, ed.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
15. Pressey, R. L., C. J. Humphries, C. R. Margules, R. I. Vane-Wright, and P. Williams. 1993. Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:124-128.
16. Rodrigues, A., J. Orestes Cerdeira, and K. Gaston. 2000. Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: Adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23:565-574.
17. Ronquist, F. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: A new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46:195-203.
18. Vane-Wright, R., C. J. Humphries, and P. H. Williams. 1991. What to protect - Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55:235-254.
19. Williams, P. H. 1996. WORLDMAP 4: Program and Documentation. Distributed by the author, www.nhm.ac.uk/science/projects/worldmap