Resorbable posterolateral graft containment in a rabbit spinal fusion model

Orthopedics

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2002, Pages

  Poynton, Ashely R ^a   Tomin, Emre ^a   Cornwall, G Bryan ^a   Zheng, Fengyu ^a   Lane, Joseph M ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYLACTIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE DEMINERALIZATION; BONE GRAFT; BONE MASS; BONE MATRIX; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; RABBIT; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VOLUMETRY;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEEP; SPINAL FUSION; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 0036804001     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993; 6:461-472.
2. France JC, Yaszemski MK, Leuerman WC, et al. A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lmbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine. 1999; 24:553-560.
3. McGuire RA, Amundson GM. The use of primary internal fixation in spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1993; 18:1662-1672.
4. Steinmann JC, Herkowitz HN. Pseudoarthrosis of the spine. Clin Orthop, 1992: 284:80-90.
5. Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC. An experimental lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion: radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical healing characteristics. Spine. 1995; 20:412-420.
6. Boden SD. Biology of lumbar spine fusion and use of bone graft substitutes: present, future and next generation. Tissue Eng. 2000; 6:383-399.
7. Toribatake Y, Hutton C, Boden SD, Morone MA. Revascularization of the fusion mass in a posterolateral intertransverse process fusion. Spine. 1998; 23:1149-1154.
8. Altner PC, Grana L, Gordon M. An experimental study on the significance of muscle tissue interposition on fracture. Clin Orthop. 1975; 111:269-273.
9. Lemperle SM, Calhoun CJ, Curran RW, Nolmes RE. Bony healing of large cranial and mandibular defects protected from soft tissue interposition: a comparative study of spontaneous bone regeneration, osteoconduction, and cancellous autografting in dogs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 101:660-672.
10. Giardino R, Fini M, Aldini NN, Giavaresi G, Rocca M. Polylactide bioabsorbable polymers for guided tissue regeneration. J Trauma. 1999; 47:303-308.
11. Isobe M, Yamazaki Y, Mori M, Amagasa T. Bone regeneration produced in rat femur defects by polymer capsules containing recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57:695-698.
12. Meing RP, Rahn B, Perren SM, Gogolewski S. Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes: treatment of diaphyseal bone defects in rabbit radius with ploy(L-lactide) membrane: a pilot study. J Orthop Tr. 1996; 10:178-190.
13. Pineda LM, Büsing M, Meinig RP, Gogolewski S. Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes. III. Effect of poly(L-lactide) membrane pore size on the bone healing process in large defects. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 31:385-394.