MR aortofemorography versus DSA: Prospective evaluation;Aortofemorographie par resonance magnetique nucleaire versus arteriographie conventionnelle: Evaluation prospective

Journal Belge de Radiologie

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 246-251

  Nchimi, A ^a   Brisbois, D ^a   Donkers, E ^a   Biquet, J F ^a   Saive, C ^a   Jadot, A ^a   Magotteaux, P ^a  

^a Clinique Saint Joseph   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Arteriosclerosis; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AORTOGRAPHY; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ABDOMINAL AORTA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMORAL ARTERY; ISCHEMIA; KNEE; LEG; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; KNEE; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036803711     PISSN: 00217646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Yucel E.K., Kaufman J.A., Geller S.C., Waltman A.C.: Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: Prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology, 1993, 187: 637-641.
2. McCauley T.R., Monib A., Dickey K.W., Clemett J., Meier G.H., Egglin T.K., Gusberg R.J., Rosenblatt M., Pollak J.S.: Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: Accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology, 1994, 192: 351-357.
3. Quinn S.F., Sheley R.C., Semonsen K.G., Leonardo V.J., Kojima K., Szumowski J.: Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: Evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology, 1998, 206: 693-701.
4. Meaney J.F., Ridgway J.R, Chakraverty S., Robertson I., Kessel D., Radjenovic A., Kouwenhoven M., Kassner A., Smith M.A.: Steppingtable gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: Preliminary experience. Radiology, 1999, 211: 59-67.
5. Sueyoshi E., Sakamoto I., Matsuoka Y., Ogawa Y., Hayashi H., Hashmi R., Hayashi K.: Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: Comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology, 1999, 210: 683-638.
6. Tangelder M.J., Algra A., Lawson J.A., Eikelboom B.C.: Risk factors for occlusion of infrainguinal bypass grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2000, 20: 118-124.
7. Olojugba D.H., McCarthy M.J., Reid A., Varty K., Naylor A.R., Bell P.R., London N.J.: Infrainguinal revascularisation in the era of vein-graft surveillance: Do clinical factors influence long-term outcome? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1999, 17: 121-128.
8. Dawson I., van Bockel J.H.: Reintervention and mortality after infrainguinal reconstructive surgery for leg ischaemia. Br J Surg, 1999, 86: 38-44.
9. Kalra M., Gloviczki P., Bower T.C., Panneton J.M., Harmsen W.S., Jenkins G.D., Stanson A.W., Toomey B.J., Canton L.G.: Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33: 6-16.
10. Verhelst R., Bruneau M., Nicolas A.L., Frangi R., El Khoury G., Noirhomme P., Dion R.: Popliteal-to-distal bypass grafts for limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg, 1997, 11: 505-509.
11. Wang Y., Lee H.M., Khilnani N.M., Trost D.W., Jagust M.B., Winchester P.A., Bush H.L., Sos T.A., Sostman H.D.: Bolus-chase MR digital subtraction angiography in the lower extremity. Radiology, 1998, 207: 263-269.
12. Czum J.M., Ho V.B., Hood M.N., Foo T.K., Choyke P.L.: Bolus-chase peripheral 3D MRA using a dual-rate contrast media injection. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000, 12: 769-775.
13. Ho K.Y., Leiner T., van Engelshoven J.M.: MR angiography of run-off vessels. Eur Radiol, 1999, 9: 1285-1289.
14. Koelemay M.J., Lijmer J.G., Stoker J., Legemate D.A., Bossuyt P.M.: Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 2001, 285: 1338-1345.
15. Baum R.A., Rutter C.M., Sunshine J.H. et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA, 1995, 274: 875-880.
16. Winterer J.T., Schaefer O., Uhrmeister P., Zimmermann-Paul G., Lehnhardt S., Altehoefer C., Laubenberger J.: Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol, 2002, 41: 153-160.
17. Prokop M.: Multislice CT angiography. Eur J Radiol, 2000, 36: 86-96.
18. Maki J.H., Wilson G.J., Eubank W.B., Hoogeveen R.M.: Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 15: 484-491.
19. Allkemper T., Bremer C., Matuszewski L., Ebert W., Reimer P.: Contrast-enhanced blood-pool MR angiography with optimized iron oxides: Effect of size and dose on vascular contrast enhancement in rabbits. Radiology, 2002, 223: 432-438.