Who's at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1385-1399

  Hindin, Michelle J ^a   Adair, Linda S ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

Abuse; Decision making; Domestic violence; Gender relations; IPV; Philippines

Indexed keywords

GENDER RELATIONS; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PHILIPPINES; PREDICTION; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL STATUS; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; BATTERED WOMEN; DECISION MAKING; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCOME; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHILIPPINES; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK FACTORS; SPOUSES;

PHILIPPINES;

EID: 0036803067     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00273-8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alcantara A.N. Gender roles, fertility, and the status of married Filipino men and women. Philippine Sociological Review. 42:1994;94-109.
2. Avila J.E., Perez L.L. Are women saying the same in sample and in-depth interviews? A comparison of survey and interview responses on household decision making and marital relations. Guerrero S.H. Selected readings on health and feminist research: A sourcebook. 1999;191-200 University of the Philippines, Quezon City.
3. Basu A.M. Girls' schooling, autonomy and fertility change. What do these words mean in South Asia? Jeffrey R., Basu A.M. Girls' schooling, women's autonomy, and fertility change in South East Asia. 1996;48-71 Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oakes, CA.
4. Blood R.O., Wolfe D.M. Husbands and wives. The dynamics of family living:1965;The Free Press, New York.
5. Blumberg R.L. Income under female versus male control. Hypotheses from a theory of gender stratification and data from the Third World Blumberg R.L. Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap. 1991;97-127 Sage Publiations, Newbury Park.
6. Cebu Study Team. (1991). Underlying and proximate determinants of child health: The Cebu longitudinal health and nutrition study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 133,185-201.
7. Cebu Study Team. (1992). A child health production function estimated from longitudinal data. Journal of Development Economics, 38, 323-351.
8. David F.P. The roles of husbands and wives in household decision-making. Philippine Sociological Review. 42:1994;78-94.
9. David, F. P., Chin, F. P., & Herradura, E. S. (1998). Family planning: Its economic and psychosocial influences on the lives of women in Western Visayas. Summary of Final Report Prepared for the Women's Studies Project: Family Health International.
10. Desai S., Saltzman L.E. Measurement issues for violence against women. Renzetti C.M., Edleson J.L., Bergen R.K. Sourcebook on violence against women. 2001;35-52 Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11. Dobash R.E., Dobash R.P. Cross-border encounters. Challenges and opportunities Dobash R.E., Dobash R.P. Rethinking violence against women. 1998;1-21 Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
12. Dwyer D., Bruce J. A home divided. Women and income in the Third World:1988;Stanford University Press, Stanford.
13. Feliciano M.S. Law, gender and the family in the Philippines. Law and Society Review. 28:1994;547-560.
14. Grisso J.A., Schwarz D.F., Hirschinger N., Sammel M., Brensinger C., Santanna J., Lowe R.A., Anderson E., Shaw L.E., Bethel C.A., Teeple L. Violent injuries among women in an urban area. New England Journal of Medicine. 341:1999;1899-1905.
15. Gwako E.L.M. Conjugal power in rural Kenyan families. Its influence on women's decisions about family size and family planning practices Sex Roles. 36:1997;127-147.
16. Heise, L., Ellsberg, M., & Gottemoeller, M. (1999). Ending violence against women. Population Reports, Series L, No. 11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program.
17. Hindin M.J. Women's power and anthropometric status in Zimbabwe. Social Science and Medicine. 51:2000;1517-1528.
18. Hindin M.J. Women's autonomy, women's status, and fertility-related behavior in Zimbabwe. Population Research and Policy Review. 19:2000;255-282.
19. Jejeebhoy S.J. Women's education, autonomy, and reproductive behavioural experiences from developing countries. 1995;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. Jejeebhoy S.J., Cook R.J. State accountability for wife-beating. The Indian challenge Lancet. 349:1997;sI10-sI12.
21. Johnson M.P., Ferraro K.J. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s. Making distinctions Journal of Marriage and the Family. 62:2000;948-963.
22. Kabeer N. Reversed realities. Gender hierarchies in development thought:1999;Verso, London.
23. Koenig, M. A., Hossain, M. B., Ahmed, S., & Haaga, J. G. (1999). Individual and community-level determinants of domestic violence in rural Bangladesh. Paper presented at the 1999 Population Association of America Meetings.
24. Kyriacou D.N., Anglin D., Taliaferro E., Stone S., Tubb T., Linden J.A., Muelleman R., Barton E., Krauss J.F. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence. New England Journal of Medicine. 341:1999;1892-1898.
25. Licuanan P.B. The Philippines. Adler L.L. International handbook on gender roles. 1993;258-268 Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
26. Martin S.L., Tsui A.O., Maitra K., Marinshaw R. Domestic violence in northern India. American Journal of Epidemiology. 150:1999;417-426.
27. Mason K.O. The status of women. A review of its relationship to fertility and mortality:1984;The Rockefeller Press, New York.
28. Mason, K. O. (1996). Wives' Economic Decision-making Power in the Family in Five Asian Countries. East-West Working Paper, No. 86.
29. Medina B.T.G. The Filipino family. 1991;University of the Philippines Press, Quezon City.
30. National Research Council (1996). Understanding Violence Against Women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. National Statistics Office [Philippines], & Macro International Inc. (1994). National Safe Motherhood Survey 1993, Calverton: National Statistics Office and Macro International.
32. Oropesa R.S. Development and marital power in Mexico. Social Forces. 75:1997;1291-1317.
33. Rakowski C.A. Gender, family, and economy in a planned industrial city. The working- and lower-class households of Cuidad Guyana Blumberg R.L. Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap. 1991;149-172 Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
34. Rao V. Wife-beating in rural southern India. A qualitative and econometric analysis Social Science and Medicine. 44:1997, 1169-1180.
35. Roldan M. Renegotiating the marital contract. Intrahousehold patterns of money allocation and women's subordination among domestic outworkers in Mexico City Dwyer D., Bruce J. A home divided: Women and income control in the Third World. 1988;229-247 Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
36. Sen A.K. Gender and cooperative conflicts. Tinker I. Persistent inequalities: Women and world development. 1990;123-149 Oxford University Press, New York.
37. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. (Release 6.0). (1999). College Station, TX, Stata Corporation.
38. Thomas D. Intrahousehold resource allocation. An inferential approach Journal of Human Resources. 25:1990;635-664.
39. World Bank. (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. World Health Organization. (1997). Violence Against Women Information Pack: A Priority Health Issue.