Epifluorescent and histochemical aspects of shoot anatomy of Typha latifolia L., Typha angustifolia L. and Typha glauca Godr.

Annals of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 489-493

  McManus, H A ^a   Seago Jr , J L ^b   Marsh, L C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cattail; Endodermis; Epidermis; Hypodermis; Leaf; Rhizomes; Stems; Typha

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT DYE;

SHOOT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOCHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; RHIZOME; TYPHACEAE;

FLUORESCENT DYES; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STEMS; RHIZOME; TYPHACEAE;

HYPODERRIS; TYPHA; TYPHA ANGUSTIFOLIA; TYPHA GLAUCA; TYPHA LATIFOLIA;

EID: 0036802768     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf211     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Clarkson DT, Robards AW. 1975. The endodermis, its structural development and physiological role. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT, eds. The development and function of roots. New York: Academic Press, 415-436.
2. Grace JB, Wetzel RG. 1981. Effects of size and growth rate on vegetative reproduction in Typha. Oecologia 50: 158-161.
3. Harms VL, Ledingham GF. 1986. The narrow-leaved cat-tail, Typha angustifolia, and the hybrid T. X glauca, newly reported from Saskatchewan. Canadian Field Naturalist 100: 107-110.
4. Kuehn MM, White BN. 1999. Morphological analysis of genetically identified cattails Typha latifolia, Typha angustifolia, and Typha X glauca. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 906-912.
5. Kuehn MM, Minor JE, White BN. 1999. An examination of hybridization between the cattail species Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia using random amplified polymorphic DNA and chloroplast DNA markers. Molecular Ecology 8: 1981-1990.
6. Marsh LC. 1955. The cattail story. The Garden Journal, July/August: 114-117.
7. Marsh LC. 1962. Studies in the genus Typha: I. Metaxenia, xenia and heterosis. II. Interspecific hybridization and the origin of T. glauca. III. Autecology, with special reference to the role of aerenchyma. PhD Thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
8. Mauseth J. 1988. Plant anatomy. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
9. Meyer FJ. 1933. Beiträge zur vergleichenden anatomie der Typhaceen (Gattung Typha). Beiheft zum botanischen Centralblatt 51: 335-376.
10. Perumalla CJ, Chmielewski JG, Peterson CA. 1990. A survey of angiosperm species to detect hypodermal Casparian bands. III. Rhizomes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 103: 127-132.
11. Rowlatt FLS, Morshead H. 1992. Architecture of the leaf of the greater reed mace, Typha latifolia L. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 161-170.
12. Saccardo F. 1895. Ricerche sull'anatomia delle Typhaceae. Malpighia Bd. IX 7: 1-26.
13. Seago JL Jr, Peterson CA, Enstone DE, Scholey C. 1999. Development of the endodermis and hypodermis of Typha glauca Godr. and Typha angustifolia L. roots. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 122-134.
14. Sharitz RR, Wineriter SA, Smith MH, Liu E. 1980. Comparison of isozymes among Typha species in the eastern United States. American Journal of Botany 67: 1297-1303.
15. Smith SG. 1961. Natural hybridization and taxonomy in the genus Typha, with particular reference to California populations. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
16. Teale EW. 1949. The strength of the cattail. Natural History 58: 404-407.
17. Thieret JW, Luken JO. 1996. The Typhaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 8: 27-56.