Cross-cultural assessment: Value for money?

Applied Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 545-566

  Van De Vijver, Fons J R ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036801147     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00107     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AERA/APA/NCME. (2000). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Barrett, P.T., Petrides, K.V., Eysenck, S.B.G., & Eysenck, H.J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805-819.
3. Bartram, D., & Coyne, I. (1998). Variations in national patterns of testing and test use: The ITC/EFPPA International Survey. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 249-260.
4. Berk, R.A. (Ed.) (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting item bias. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Cascio, W.F. (1987). Applied psychology in personnel management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Cascio, W.F., Outtz, J., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I.L. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 233-264.
7. Cattell, R.B. (1940). A culture-free intelligence test, I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 176-199.
8. Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (1963). Culture Fair Intelligence Test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
9. Cheung, F.M., Leung, K., Fan, R.M., Song, W.Z., Zhang, J.X., & Chang, J.P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181-199.
10. Cronbach, L.J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th edn.). New York: Harper & Row.
11. Deregowski, J.B., & Serpell, R. (1971). Performance on a sorting task: A cross-cultural experiment. International Journal of Psychology, 6, 273-281.
12. Dixit, A., & Skeath, S. (1999). Games of strategy. New York: Norton.
13. Eysenck, H.J., Barrett, P., & Eysenck, S.B. (1985). Indices of factor comparison for homologous and non-homologous personality scales in 24 different countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 503-504.
14. Fink, E.C., Gates, S., & Humes, B.D. (1998). Game theory topics: Incomplete information, repeated games, and N-player games. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-122. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Frijda, N., & Jahoda, G. (1966). On the scope and methods of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 109-127.
16. Gass, S.M., & Varonis, E.M. (1991). Miscommunication in nonnative speaker discourse. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J.M. Wiemann (Eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk (pp. 121-145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment (Bulletin of the International Test Commission), 10, 229-244.
18. Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P.F., & Spielberger, C.D. (Eds.) (in press). Adapting educational tests and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mawhaw, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Helms-Lorenz, M. (2001). Cultural influence on cognitive test performance. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
20. Herrnstein, R.J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
21. Hessels, M.G.P. (1993). Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden. Theoretische en empirische verantwoording [Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities: Theoretical and empirical background]. Rotterdam: RISBO.
22. Hessels, M.G.P. (1996). Ethnic differences in learning potential test scores: Research into item and test bias in the Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 133-153.
23. Holland, P.W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721-735.
25. Jensen, A.R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
26. Lucio, E., Reyes-Lagunes, I., & Scott, R.L. (1994). MMPI-2 for Mexico: Translation and adaptation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 105-116.
27. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
28. Mercer, J.R. (1979). Technical manual. System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment. New York: Psychological Corporation.
29. Petersen, N.S., & Novick, M.R. (1976). An evaluation of some models for culture-fair selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 3-29.
30. Poortinga, Y.H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737-756.
31. Sackett, P.R., & Wilk, S.L. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49, 929-954.
32. Schmidt, F.L. (1991). Why all banding procedures in personnel selection are logically flawed. Human Performance, 4, 265-277.
33. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
34. Te Nijenhuis, J. (1997). Bias in intelligence testing of immigrants in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Free University.
35. Van Beek, K.W.H. (1993). To be hired or not to be hired, the employer decides: Relative chances of unemployed job-seekers on the Dutch labor market. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
36. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Bleichrodt, N. (Eds.) (2001). Diagnostiek bij allochtonen. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets.
37. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
38. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997a). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J.W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd edn., vol. 1) (pp. 257-300). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997b). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33-51.
41. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29-37.
42. Zedeck, S., Outtz, J., Cascio, W.F., & Goldstein, I.L. (1991). Why do "testing" experts have such limited vision? Human Perfomance, 4, 297-308.