Recognising diversity in public preferences: The use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. Authors' reply

Health Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 653-654

  Sculpher, Mark ^a   Gafni, Amiram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 0036797155     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.736     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Robinson A, Parkin D. Recognising diversity in public preferences: the use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. A response to Sculpher and Gafni. Health Econ. (in press).
2. Weinstein MC, Zeckhauser R. Critical ratios and efficient allocation. J public Econ 1973; 2: 147-157.
3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technical Guidance for Manufacturers and Sponsors on making a Submission to a Technology, Appraisal (http://www.nice.org.uk). National Institute for Clinical Excellence: London, 2001.
4. Raftery J. NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. Br Med J 2001; 323: 1300-1303.
5. Birch S, Gafni A. Cost effectiveness/utility analyses: do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? J Health Econ 1992; 11: 279-296.