Effect of prior revascularization on outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention: NHLBI dynamic registry

European Heart Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 19, 2002, Pages 1546-1555

  Bourass, M G ^a   Detre, Katherine M ^b   Johnston, J M ^b   Vlachos, H A ^b   Holubkov, R ^b  

^a MONTREAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Angina; Coronary bypass surgery; Death or myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Registry; Repeat revascularization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; RETREATMENT;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036796993     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3262     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bourassa MG, Enjalbert M, Campeau L, Lespérance J. Progression of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries and bypass grafts: Ten years later. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 102C-7C.
2. Bourassa MG, Lesperance J, Eastwood C et al. Clinical, physiologic, anatomic and procedural factors predictive of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 368-76.
3. Foster ED, Fisher LD, Kaiser GC, Myers WO. Comparison of operative mortality and morbidity for initial and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1984; 38: 563-70.
4. Grondin CM, Pomar JL, Hébert Y et al. Reoperation in patients with patent atherosclerotic coronary vein grafts. A different approach to a different disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 87: 379-85.
5. Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Gersh BJ et al. The morbidity and mortality of reoperation for coronary artery disease and analysis of late results with use of actuarial estimate of event-free interval. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 85: 508-15.
6. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM et al. Fifteen hundred coronary reoperations. Results and determinants of early and late survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 93: 847-59.
7. Quigley PJ, Hlatky MA, Hinohara T et al. Repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and predictors of recurrent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 409-13.
8. Black AJR, Anderson W, Roubin GS et al. Repeat coronary angioplasty: Correlates of a second restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 714-8.
9. Holmes DR Jr, Vlietstra RE, Smith HC et al. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): A report from the PTCA registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 77C-81C.
10. Douglas JS Jr, Gruentzig AR, King SB III et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with prior coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2: 745-54.
11. Block PC, Cowley MJ, Kaltenbach M, Kent KM, Simpson J. Percutaneous angioplasty of stenoses of bypass grafts or of bypass graft anastomotic sites. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 666-8.
12. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F et al., for the Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-95.
13. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS et al., for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
14. Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo (SAVED) trial investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 740-7.
15. Foley JB, Penn IM, Brown RIG et al. Safety, success, and restenosis after elective coronary implantation of the PalmazSchatz stent in 100 patients at a single center. Am Heart J 1992; 125: 686-94.
16. Savage MP, Fischman DL, Schatz RA et al. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in the native coronary circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1207-12.
17. Moscucci M, Piana RN, Kuntz RE et al. Effect of prior coronary restenosis on the risk of subsequent restenosis after stent placement or directional atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 1147-53.
18. Mittal S, Weiss DL, Hirshfeld JW, Kolansky DM, Herrmann HC. Comparison of outcome after stenting for de novo versus restenotic narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 711-5.
19. Gruberg L, Hong MK, Mintz GS et al. Optimally deployed stents in the treatment of restenotic versus de novo lesions. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 333-7.
20. Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 221-7.
21. Adelman AG, Cohen EA, Kimball BP et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 228-33.
22. Reifart N, Vandormael M, Krajcar M et al. Randomized comparison of angioplasty of complex coronary lesions at a single center. Excimer Laser, Rotational Atherectomy, and Balloon Angioplasty Comparison (ERBAC) Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 91-8.
23. Laskey WK, Williams DO, Vlachos HA et al. Changes in the practice of percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of enrollment waves in the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 964-9.
24. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54: 522-3.
25. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 529-45.
26. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.
27. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc (B) 1972; 34: 187-220.
28. De Feyter PJ, van Suylen RJ, de Jaegere PP, Topol J, Serruys PW. Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of lesions in saphenous vein bypass grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1539-49.
29. Wong SC, Baim DS, Schatz RA et al. Immediate results and late outcome after stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: The multicenter U.S.A. Palmaz-Schatz stent experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 704-12.
30. Brener SJ, Ellis SG, Apperson-Hansen C, Leon MB, Topol EJ. Comparison of stenting and balloon angioplasty for narrowings in aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits in place for more than five years. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 13-8.
31. Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM et al for the CAVEAT-II Investigators. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. Circulation 1995; 91: 1966-74.
32. Suwaidi JA, Velianu JL, Berger PB et al. Primary percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 452-9.