Effect of swim up and Percoll treatment on viability and acrosome integrity of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 285-290

  Somfai, T ^a   Bodo S ^b   Nagy, S ^b   Papp, A B ^b   Ivancsics J ^b   Baranyai, B ^b   Gocza E ^b   Kovacs A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST HUNGARY   (Hungary)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERCOLL; POVIDONE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ACROSOME; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CATTLE; CELL SEPARATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; EVALUATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ACROSOME; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL SEPARATION; CENTRIFUGATION, DENSITY GRADIENT; CRYOPRESERVATION; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; POVIDONE; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SILICON DIOXIDE; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS;

EID: 0036795812     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00350.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akerlof E, Fredricson B, Gustafsson O, Lundin A, Lunell NO, Nylund L, Rosenborg L, Pousette A, 1987: Comparison between a swim up and a Percoll gradient technique for the separation of human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 10, 663-669.
2. Avery B, Greve T, 1995: Impact of Percoll on bovine spermatozoa used for in vitro insemination. Theriogenology 44, 871-878.
3. Brandeis VT, Manuel MT, 1993: Effect of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 409-416.
4. Chan SY, Chan YM, Tucker MJ, 1991: Comparison of characteristics of human spermatozoa selected by the multiple tube swim-up and simple discontinous Percoll gradient centrifugation. Andrologia 23, 213-218.
5. Check JH, Katsoff D, Kozak J, Lurie D, 1992: Effect of swim-up, Percoll and Sephadex sperm separation methods on the hypo-osmotic swelling test. Hum Reprod 7, 109-111.
6. Correa JR, Zavos PM, 1996: Preparation and recovery of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa via various sperm selection techniques employed in assisted reproductive technologies. Theriogenology 46, 1225-1232.
7. Dott HM, Harrison RAP, Foster GCA, 1979: The maintenance of motility and the surface properties of epididymal spermatozoa from bull, rabbit and ram homologous seminal and epididymal plasma. J Reprod Fertil 55, 113-124.
8. Drevius LO, 1972: The 'sperm-rise' test. J Reprod Fertil 24, 427-432.
9. Englert Y, van Den Bergh M, Rodesch C, Bertrand E, Biramane J, Legreve A, 1992: Comparative auto-controlled study between swim-up and Percoll preparation of fresh semen samples for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 7, 399-402.
10. Garner DL, Thomas CA, Gravance CG, Marshall CE, DeJarnette JM, Allen CH, 2001: Seminal plasma addition attenuates the dilution effect in bovine sperm. Theriogenology 56, 31-40.
11. Harrison RAP, Dott HM, Foster GC, 1982: Bovine serum albumin, sperm motility, and the 'dilution effect'. J Exp Zool 222, 81-88.
12. Kovacs A, Foote RH, 1992: Viability and acrosome staining of bull, boar and rabbit spermatozoa. Biot Histoc 67, 119-124.
13. Lessley BA, Garner D, 1983: Isolation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation in Percoll. Gamete Res 7, 49-61.
14. Menkveld R, Swanson RJ, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, 1990: Comparison of a discontinuous Percoll gradient method versus a swim-up method: effects on sperm morphology and other semen parameters. Andrologia 22, 152-158.
15. Morales P, Vantman D, Barros C, Vigil P, 1991: Human spermatozoa selected by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 6, 401-404.
16. Nagy Sz, Hazas G, Bali Papp A, Ivancsics J, Szasz F, Szasz F Jr, Kovacs A, Foote RH, 1999: Evaluation of sperm tail membrane integrity by light microscopy. Theriogenology 52, 1153-1159.
17. Nevo AC, Mohan R, 1969: Migration of motile spermatozoa into sperm-free medium and the 'dilution effect'. J Reprod Fertil 18, 379-381.
18. Parrish JJ, Krogenaes A, Susko-Parrish JL, 1995: Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swim-up or Percoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development. Theriogenology 44, 859-869.
19. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, Critser ES, Eyestone WH, First NL, 1986: Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 25, 591-600.
20. Punjabi U, Gerris J, van Bijlen J, Delbeke L, Gielis M, Buytaert P, 1990: Comparison between different pre-treatment techniques for sperm recovery prior to intrauterine insemination, GIFT or IVF. Hum Reprod 5, 75-83.
21. Rodriguez-Martinez H, Larrson B, Pertoft H, 1997: Evaluation of sperm damage and techniques for sperm clean-up. Reprod Fertil Dev 9, 297-308.
22. Sapienza F, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Janssens R, Pletincx I, Derde M, van Steirteghem A, 1993: An auto-controlled study in in vitro fertilization reveals the benefit of Percoll centrifugation to swim-up in the preparation of poor quality semen. Hum Reprod 8, 1856-1862.
23. Shamsuddin M, Rodriguez-Martinez H, 1994: A simple, nontraumatic method for the selection of spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization in the bovine. Anim Rep Sci 36, 61-75.
24. Sterzik K, De Santo M, Uhlich S, Gagsteiger F, Stehler E, 1998: Glass wool filtration leads to a higher percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes: an ultrastructural analysis. Hum Reprod 13, 2506-2511.
25. Valcarcel A, de las Heras M, Moses DF, Perez LJ, Baldassarre H, 1996: Comparison between Sephadex G-10 and Percoll for preparation of normospermic, asthenospermic and frozen/thawed ram semen. Anim Rep Sci 41, 215-224.
26. Watson PF, 2000: The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Report Sci 60-61, 481-492.