-
1
-
-
0000346103
-
The juvenile court
-
Mack J. The juvenile court. Harvard Law Review 1909;23:104-22.
-
(1909)
Harvard Law Review
, vol.23
, pp. 104-122
-
-
Mack, J.1
-
2
-
-
0010840730
-
-
Kent v United States, 383 US 541 (1966)
-
Kent v United States, 383 US 541 (1966).
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
0010841694
-
-
In re Gault, 387 US 1 (1967)
-
In re Gault, 387 US 1 (1967).
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
0010907224
-
-
In re Winship, 397 US 358 (1970)
-
In re Winship, 397 US 358 (1970).
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
0010847759
-
-
Breed v Jones, 421, US 519 (1975)
-
Breed v Jones, 421, US 519 (1975).
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
0010910018
-
-
McKeiver v Pennsylvania, 403 US 528 (1971)
-
McKeiver v Pennsylvania, 403 US 528 (1971).
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
0010906306
-
-
Schall v Martin, 467 US 253 (1984)
-
Schall v Martin, 467 US 253 (1984).
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
0030036868
-
Society's retributive response to juvenile violence
-
Grisso T. Society's retributive response to juvenile violence. Law Hum Behav 1996;20:229-47.
-
(1996)
Law Hum Behav
, vol.20
, pp. 229-247
-
-
Grisso, T.1
-
10
-
-
0010841438
-
-
Dusky v US, 362 US 402 (1960)
-
Dusky v US, 362 US 402 (1960).
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0010769736
-
-
Godinez v Moran, 113 S Ct 2680 (1993)
-
Godinez v Moran, 113 S Ct 2680 (1993).
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0010841439
-
-
In re Causey, 363 So. 2d 472 (La 1978)
-
In re Causey, 363 So. 2d 472 (La 1978).
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0029840991
-
Juvenile competency to stand trial: Research Issues in Practice
-
Heilburn K, Hawk G, Tate DC. Juvenile competency to stand trial: research Issues in Practice. Law Hum Behav 1996;20:573-8.
-
(1996)
Law Hum Behav
, vol.20
, pp. 573-578
-
-
Heilburn, K.1
Hawk, G.2
Tate, D.C.3
-
16
-
-
0004223955
-
-
Sarasota (FL): Professional Resource Press
-
Grisso T. Forensic evaluations of juveniles. Sarasota (FL): Professional Resource Press; 1998. p. 85-7.
-
(1998)
Forensic evaluations of juveniles
, pp. 85-87
-
-
Grisso, T.1
-
17
-
-
0002648998
-
What we know about youth's capacities as trial defendants
-
Grisso T, Schwartz RG, editors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
-
Grisso T. What we know about youth's capacities as trial defendants. In: Grisso T, Schwartz RG, editors. Youth on trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 139-71.
-
(2000)
Youth on trial
, pp. 139-171
-
-
Grisso, T.1
-
18
-
-
0010840731
-
-
Va Code Ann. § 16.1-269.1 (Michie, 1996)
-
Va Code Ann. § 16.1-269.1 (Michie, 1996).
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
0010907470
-
-
Ex parte Brown, 540 So 2d 740, 745 (Ala 1989)
-
Ex parte Brown, 540 So 2d 740, 745 (Ala 1989).
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0010771255
-
-
Matter of LeBlanc, 430 NW 2d 780, 783 (Mich App 1988)
-
Matter of LeBlanc, 430 NW 2d 780, 783 (Mich App 1988).
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
0002615537
-
Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders
-
Grisso T, Schwartz RG, editors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
-
Bonnie BJ, Grisso T. Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In: Grisso T, Schwartz RG, editors. Youth on trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 73-104.
-
(2000)
Youth on trial
, pp. 73-104
-
-
Bonnie, B.J.1
Grisso, T.2
-
22
-
-
0003113015
-
Prevalence of mental disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system
-
Cocozza J, editor. Seattle: National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System
-
Otto RJ, Greenstein M, Johnson M, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system. In: Cocozza J, editor. Responding to the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system. Seattle: National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System; 1992. p. 1-47.
-
(1992)
Responding to the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system
, pp. 1-47
-
-
Otto, R.J.1
Greenstein, M.2
Johnson, M.3
-
23
-
-
0021438274
-
Competency to stand trial among adolescents
-
Savitsky J, Karras D. Competency to stand trial among adolescents. Adolesc 1984;19:349-58.
-
(1984)
Adolesc
, vol.19
, pp. 349-358
-
-
Savitsky, J.1
Karras, D.2
-
24
-
-
0030797937
-
Juveniles's understanding of trial-related information: Are they competent defendants?
-
Cooper D. Juveniles's understanding of trial-related information: are they competent defendants? Behav Sci Law 1997;15:167-80.
-
(1997)
Behav Sci Law
, vol.15
, pp. 167-180
-
-
Cooper, D.1
-
25
-
-
0001577741
-
Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: Cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship
-
Crowden V, McKee G. Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship. Journal of Family Law 1995;33:629-60.
-
(1995)
Journal of Family Law
, vol.33
, pp. 629-660
-
-
Crowden, V.1
McKee, G.2
-
28
-
-
0032915946
-
Competency to stand trial in family court: Characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles
-
McKee GR, Shea SJ. Competency to stand trial in family court: characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 1999;27:65-74.
-
(1999)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law
, vol.27
, pp. 65-74
-
-
McKee, G.R.1
Shea, S.J.2
-
30
-
-
0003462435
-
-
(Publ. No. ADM 77-103). Rockville (MD): Department of Health, Education and Welfare
-
McGarry L. Competency to stand trial and mental illness (Publ. No. ADM 77-103). Rockville (MD): Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1973.
-
(1973)
Competency to stand trial and mental illness
-
-
McGarry, L.1
-
32
-
-
0023728935
-
A comparison of instruments for assessing competency to stand trial
-
Nicholson R, Robertson H, Johnson W, et al. A comparison of instruments for assessing competency to stand trial. Law Hum Behav 1988;12:313-21.
-
(1988)
Law Hum Behav
, vol.12
, pp. 313-321
-
-
Nicholson, R.1
Robertson, H.2
Johnson, W.3
-
33
-
-
0030726837
-
The MacArthur Adjudication Competence Study: Diagnosis, psychopathology and adjudicative competence-related abilities
-
Hoge S, Poythress N, Bonnie R, et al. The MacArthur Adjudication Competence Study: diagnosis, psychopathology and adjudicative competence-related abilities. Behav Sci Law 1997;15:329-45.
-
(1997)
Behav Sci Law
, vol.15
, pp. 329-345
-
-
Hoge, S.1
Poythress, N.2
Bonnie, R.3
-
34
-
-
0010771256
-
-
Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
-
Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966).
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
0010769737
-
-
Haley v Ohio, 332 US 596 (1948)
-
Haley v Ohio, 332 US 596 (1948).
-
-
-
-
36
-
-
0010769738
-
-
Fare v Michael C., 442 US 707 (1979)
-
Fare v Michael C., 442 US 707 (1979).
-
-
-
-
39
-
-
0001023679
-
Juveniles' capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis
-
Grisso T. Juveniles' capacities to waive Miranda rights: an empirical analysis. California Law Review 1980;68:1134-66.
-
(1980)
California Law Review
, vol.68
, pp. 1134-1166
-
-
Grisso, T.1
-
40
-
-
4243511572
-
State of mind assessments: Competency/criminal responsibility
-
Schetky DH, Benedek EP, editors. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing
-
Voigt CJ, Heisel DE, Benedek EP. State of mind assessments: competency/criminal responsibility. In: Schetky DH, Benedek EP, editors. Comprehensive textbook of child and adolescent forensic psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2002. p. 297-305.
-
(2002)
Comprehensive textbook of child and adolescent forensic psychiatry
, pp. 297-305
-
-
Voigt, C.J.1
Heisel, D.E.2
Benedek, E.P.3
-
41
-
-
0010840732
-
-
Km v State, 983 SW 2d (Ark 1998)
-
KM v State, 983 SW 2d (Ark 1998).
-
-
-
-
42
-
-
0028323507
-
A clinical follow-up of delinquent males: Ignored vulnerabilities, unmet needs, and the perpetration of violence
-
Lewis DO, Yeager CA, Lovely R. A clinical follow-up of delinquent males: ignored vulnerabilities, unmet needs, and the perpetration of violence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994;33:518-28.
-
(1994)
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
, vol.33
, pp. 518-528
-
-
Lewis, D.O.1
Yeager, C.A.2
Lovely, R.3
-
43
-
-
0010840527
-
-
State v. Nemeth, Ohio St. 3d (1998)
-
State v. Nemeth, Ohio St. 3d (1998)
-
-
-
|