Is posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible?

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 299-303

  Orr, R D ^a   Siegler, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER DONOR; CASE REPORT; CHILD WELFARE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PROGENY; SPERM DONOR; SPOUSE; WIDOW;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; CRYOPRESERVATION; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION; REPRODUCTION; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPECIMEN HANDLING; SPERMATOZOA; UNITED STATES; WIDOWHOOD;

EID: 0036792618     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.299     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Banks GJ. Traditional concepts and nontraditional conceptions: social Security survivor's benefits for posthumously conceived children. Loyola of Los Angeles Low Review 1999;32:251-379.
2. Rothman CM. A method for obtaining viable sperm in the postmortem state. Fertility and Sterility 1980;34:512.
3. Baby is born using sperm from baby's dead father. Los Angeles Times 1999 Mar 27: 4.
4. Kerr SM, Caplan A, Polin G, et al. Postmortem sperm procurement. Journal of Urology 1997;167:2154-6.
5. Goldstein M. Surgical management of male infertility and other scrotal disorders. In: Walsh PC, Retnik AB, Vaughan ED, et al, eds. Campbell's urology [7th ed]. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1998: 1363.
6. Andrews LB. The sperminator. The New York Times Magazine 1999 Mar 28: 62-5.
7. May W. Attitudes toward the newly dead. Hastings Center Report 1973;1:3-13.
8. Iserson KV. Death to dust. Tuscon, AZ: Galen Press, 1994: 138.
9. Kimura R. Japan's dilemma with the definition of death. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1991;1:123-31.
10. Shewmon DA. 'Brainstem death', 'brain death', and death: a critical re-evaluation of the purported equivalence. Issues in Law & Medicine 1998; 14:125-45.
11. Management of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1993;3:A1-A15. This paper appeared in The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy and procedure manual, which was preprinted as an appendix to this issue of the journal.
12. Orr RD, Gundry SR, Bailey LL. Reanimation: overcoming objections and obstacles to organ retrieval from non-heart-beating cadaver donors. Journal of Medical Ethics 1997;23:7-11.
13. Fox R. 'An ignoble form of cannibalism': reflections on the Pittsburgh protocol for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadavers. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1993;3:231-9.
14. Cohen C. The case for presumed consent to transplant human organs after death. Transplantation Proceedings 1992;XXIV:2168-72.
15. Frader JE. Have we lost our senses? Problems with maintaining brain-dead bodies carrying fetuses. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1993;4:347-8.
16. Iserson KV. Law versus life: the ethical imperative to practise and teach using the newly dead emergency department patient. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995;25:91-4.
17. Goldblatt AD. Don't ask, don't tell: practising minimally invasive resuscitation techniques on the newly dead. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995:25:86-90.
18. Burns JP, Reardon FE, Truog RD. Using newly deceased patients to teach resuscitation procedures. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;331:1652-5.
19. See reference 6: 65.
20. Applebaum PS, Lidz CW, Meisel A. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
21. Childress JF. Who should decide: paternalism in health care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982: 82-3.
22. See reference 21: 83-5.
23. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (England): ch 37.
24. Gringlas M, Weinraub M. The more things change ... single parenting revisited. Journal of Family Issues 1995;16:29-52.
25. Kahan SE, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Postmortem sperm procurement: a legal perspective. Journal of Urology 1999;161:1840-3.
26. Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 1997;67(suppl): 1-9S.