Handbooks and history: Is it still the American science of politics?

International Political Science Review

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2002, Pages

  Gunnell, John G ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

American vision; History and scholarship; International studies; Political science

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036790451     PISSN: 01925121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192512102023004001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Almond, G. (1988). "Separate tables: Schools and sects in political science." PS, 21: 828-842.
2. Almond, G. (1996). "Political science: The history of the discipline." In A New Handbook of Political Science (R. Goodin and H.-D.Klingemann, eds), 50-96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Almond, G., and S. Verba (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Anckar, D. (ed.) (1988). The Development of Political Science. Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.
5. Anckar, D. and E. Berndtson (1987). "The evolution of political science: Selected case studies." International Political Science Review, 8.
6. Andrews, W.G. (1982). International Handbook of Political Science. Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press.
7. Crick, B. (1958). The American Science of Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Crotty, W. (1991). Political Science: Looking to the Future, 4 vols. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
9. Dryzek, J.S. and S.T. Leonard (1988). "History and discipline in political science." American Political Science Review, 82: 1245-1260.
10. Easton, D. (1969). "The postbehavioral revolution." American Political Science Review, 60: 1051-1061.
11. Easton, D., J.G. Gunnell, and L. Graziano (eds) (1991). The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey. London: Routledge.
12. Easton, D., J.G. Gunnell, and M. Stein (eds) (1995). Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13. Farr, J., Dryzek, J.S., and S. Leonard (1995). Political Science and Its History: Research Programs and Political Traditions. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
14. Farr, J., J. Gunnell, R. Seidelman, J.S. Dryzek, and S. Leonard (1990). "Can political science history be neutral?" American Political Science Review, 84: 587-607.
15. Farr, J. and R. Seidelman (eds) (1993). Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Finifter, A. (ed.) (1983). Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
17. Finifter, A. (1993). Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
18. Freeman, D.M. (1991). "The making of a Discipline." In Political Science: Looking to the Future (W. Crotty, ed.), 15-44. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
19. Goodin, R., and H.-D. Klingemann (eds) (1996). A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Greenstein, F. and N. Polsby (eds) (1975). Handbook of Political Science, 8 vols. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Gunnell, J.G. (1983). "Political theory: The evolution of a sub-field." In Political Science: The Sate of the Discipline (A. Finifter, ed.), 3-45. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
22. Gunnell, J.G. (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Gunnell, J.G. (1998). The Orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science and Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
24. Hartz, L. (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
25. Moon, J.D. (1975). "Political inquiry: A synthesis of opposed perspectives." In Handbook of Political Science (F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, eds), 131-228. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Moon, J.D. (1991). "Pluralism and progress in the study of politics." In Political Science: Looking to the Future (W. Crotty, ed.), 35-46. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
27. Rićci, D.M. (1984). The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Ross, D. (1991). The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Seidelman, R. (with E. Harpham) (1985). Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30. Somit, A. and J. Tanenhaus (1967). The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Valles, J.M. and K. Newton (eds) (1991). "Political science in Western Europe, 1960-90." European Journal of Political Research, 20: 225-466.
32. Waldo, D. (1956). Political Science in the United States of America: A Trend Report. Paris: UNESCO.
33. Waldo, D. (1975). "Political science: Tradition, discipline, profession, science, enterprise." In Handbook of Political Science (F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, eds), 1-130. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.