In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 437-441

  Grasso, Caroline A ^a,c   Caluori, Domenic M ^b   Goldstein, Gary R ^a   Hittelman, Eugene ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE; TOOTH CEMENT; CHLORHEXIDINE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; PUMICE; SILICATE; SURFACTANT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FLOUR; HUMAN; MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHLORHEXIDINE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 0036782885     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128123     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:482-6.
2. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:122-8.
3. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:116-21.
4. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996. p. 25-6, 566.
5. McComb D. Retention of castings with glass ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:285-8.
6. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:211-5.
7. Grajower R, Hirschfeld Z, Zalkind M. Compatibility of a composite resin with pulp insulating materials. A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:70-7.
8. Grajower R, Hirschfeld Z, Zalkind M. Observations on cavity liners for composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:265-73.
9. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of temporary cementation on permanent retention to composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:856-9.
10. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14.
11. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin-bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:516-20.
12. Terata R, Nakashima K, Obara M, Kubota M. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent Mater J 1994;13:148-54.
13. Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993;12:18-28.
14. Button GL, Moon PC, Barnes RF, Gunsolley JC. Effect of preparation cleansing procedures on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:145-8.
15. Bachmann M, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Effect of cleansing dentine with soap and pumice on shear bond strength of dentine-bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:433-8.
16. Powell F. Statistical tables for the social, biological, and physical sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 92.