Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues: I. Exploring a neural network approach

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 378-387

  Honey, R C ^a,b   Ward Robinson, Jasper ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036780301     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.28.4.378     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H., & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 67-72.
2. Coutureau, E., Killcross, A. S., Good, M., Marshall, V. J., Ward-Robinson, J., & Honey, R. C. (2002). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues: II. Neural manipulations and their implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 388-396.
3. Delamater, A. R. (1998). Associative mediational processes in the acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 467-482.
4. Delamater, A. R., & Joseph, P. (2000). Common coding in symbolic matching tasks in humans: Training with a common consequence or antecedent. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 255-273.
5. Eisman, B. S. (1955). Attitude formation: The development of a colour preference response through mediated generalization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 321-326.
6. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New, York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
8. Goldstone, R. L. (1998), Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-610.
9. Grice, G. R., & Davis, J. D. (1958). Mediated stimulus equivalence and distinctiveness in human conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 565-571.
10. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
11. Hall, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning, Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 233-255.
12. Hall, G., Ray, E., & Bonardi, C. (1993). Acquired equivalence between cues trained with a common antecedent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 391-399.
13. Hodder, K. I., George, D. N., Killcross, A. S., & Honey, R. C. (in press). Representational blending in human conditional learning: Implications for associative theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
14. Honey, R. C. (2000). The Experimental Psychology Society Prize Lecture: Associative priming in Pavlovian conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 1-23.
15. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 178-184.
16. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1991). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues using a sensory-preconditioning procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 121-135.
17. Honey, R. C., & Ward-Robinson, J. (2001). Transfer between contextual conditional discriminations: An examination of how stimulus conjunctions are represented. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 196-205.
18. Honey, R. C., & Watt, A. (1998). Acquired relational equivalence: Implications for the nature of associative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 325-334.
19. Honey, R. C., & Watt, A. (1999). Acquired relational equivalence between contexts and features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 324-333.
20. Hull, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review, 46, 9-30.
21. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
22. Johns, K. W., & Williams, D. A. (1998). Acquired equivalence learning with antecedent and consequent unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 3-14.
23. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrate activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Mackintosh, N. J. (1994). Introduction. In N. J. Mackintosh (Ed.), Animal learning and cognition (pp. 1-13). London: Academic Press.
25. Maki, W. S. (1993). From elementary associations to animal cognition: Connectionist models of discrimination learning. In T. R. Zentall (Ed.), Animal cognition: A tribute to Donald A. Riley (pp. 293-312). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
26. Maki, W. S., & Abunawass, A. M. (1991). A connectionist approach to conditional discriminations: Learning, short-term memory, and attention. In M. L. Commons, S. Grossberg, & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Neural network models of conditioning and action (pp. 241-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. Myers, C. E., Gluck, M. A., & Granger, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116-138.
29. Oswald, C. P. J., Yee, B. K., Rawlins, J. N. P., Bannerman, D. B., Good, M., & Honey, R. C. (2001). Involvement of the entorhinal cortex in a process of attentional modulation: Evidence from a novel variant of an IDS/EDS procedure. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 841-849.
30. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
31. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
32. Postman, L. (1955). Association theory and perceptual learning. Psychological Review, 62, 438-446.
33. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McLelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. I. Foundations (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Sawa, K., & Nakajima, S. (2001). Reintegration of stimuli after acquired distinctiveness training. Learning and Motivation, 32, 100-114.
36. Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 158-178.
37. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear and R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Ward-Robinson, J., & Hall, G. (1999). The role of mediated conditioning in acquired equivalence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 335-350.
39. Ward-Robinson, J., & Honey, R. C. (2000). A novel contextual dimension for use with an operant chamber: From simple to hierarchical forms of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 358-363.