Phylogeny of the Malus (Apple Tree) species, inferred from the morphological traits and molecular DNA analysis

Genetika

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1357-1369

  Forte, A V ^a   Ignatov, A N ^b   Ponomarenko, V V ^c   Dorokhov, D B ^b   Savelyev, N I ^a  

^a IV Michurin Federal Scientific Centre   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOENGINEERING   (Russian Federation)

^c Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 1; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 2; PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME RNA; MESSENGER RIBONUCLEIC ACID MATURASE; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; RIBONUCLEASE; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RNA 5.8S; SPACER DNA;

APPLE; ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; DNA DETERMINATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE SEQUENCE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PLANT MORPHOLOGY; PLANT TAXONOMY; ASIA; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA;

MALUS; MALUS ANGUSTIFOLIA; MALUS CORONARIA; MALUS IOENSIS; MALUS SIEVERSII; MALUS TRILOBATA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

ASIA; DNA, INTERGENIC; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; ENDORIBONUCLEASES; MALUS; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; PHYLOGENY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5.8S; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0036776958     PISSN: 00166758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Soltis E.D., Soltis P.S. Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution // Plant Mol. Biol. 2000. V. 42. P. 45-75.
2. Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.P., Livak K.J. et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers // Nucl. Acids Res. 1990. V. 18. No 22. P. 6531-6536.
3. Welsh J., McClelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers // Nucl. Acids Res. 1990. V. 18. No 24. P. 7213-7218.
4. Caetano-Anolles G. Amplifying DNA with arbitrary oligonucleotide primers // PCR Methods and Applications. 1993. V. 4. P. 85-94.
5. Oliveira C.M., Mota M., Monte-Corvo L. et al. Molecular typing of Pyrus based on RAPD markers // Sci. Hortic. 1999 V. 79. P. 163-174.
6. Degani C., Rowland L.J., Saunders J.A. et al. A comparison of genetic relationship measures in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) based on AFLP, RAPD and pedigree data // Euphytica. 2001. V. 117. P. 1-12.
7. Moreno S., Martin J.P., Ortiz J.M. Inter-simple sequence repeats PCR for characterization of closely related grapevine germplasm // Euphytica. 1998. V. 101. P. 117-125.
8. Monte-Corvo L., Cabrita L., Oliveira C., Leitao J. Assessment of genetic relationships among Pyrus species and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers // Genet. Res. Crop. Evolut. 2000. V. 47. P. 257-265.
9. Dunemann F., Kahnau R., Schmidt H. Genetic relationships in Malus evaluated by RAPD "fingerprinting" of cultivars and wild species // Plant Breeding. 1994. V. 113. P. 150-159.
10. Landry B.S., Li R.Q., Cheung W.Y., Granger R.L. Phylogeny analysis of 25 apple rootstocks using RAPD markers and tactical gene tagging // Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994. V. 89. P. 847-852.
11. Zhou Z.Q., Li Y.N. The RAPD evidence for the phylogenetic relationship of the closely related species of cultivated apple // Genet. Res. Crop Evolut. 2000. V. 47. P. 353-357.
12. Shimada T., Hayama H., Haji T. et al. Genetic diversity of plums characterized by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis // Euphytica. 1999. V. 109. P. 143-147.
13. Shimada T., Hayama H., Nishimura K. et al. The genetic diversities of 4 species of subg. Luthocerasus (Prunus, Rosaceae) revealed by RAPD analysis // Euphytica. 2001. V. 117. P. 85-90.
14. Casas A.M., Igartua E., Balaguer G., Moreno M.A. Genetic diversity of Prunus rootstocks analyzed by RAPD markers // Euphytica. 1999. V. 110. P. 139-149.
15. Heinkel R., Hartmann W., Stosser R. On the origin of the plum cultivars "Cacaks Beauty", "Cacaks Best", "Cacaks Fruitful" as investigated by the inheritance of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fragments // Sci. Hortic. 2000. V. 83. P. 149-155.
16. Fanizza G., Colonna G., Resta P., Ferrara G. The effect of the number of RAPD markers on the evaluation of genotypic distances in Vitis vinifera // Euphytica. 1999. V. 107. P. 45-50.
17. Vidal J.R., Coarer M., Defontaine A. Genetic relationships among grapevine varieties grown in different French and Spanish regions based on RAPD markers // Euphytica. 1999. V. 109. P. 161-172.
18. Lanham P.G. Estimation of heterozigosity in Ribes nigrum L. using RAPD markers // Genetica. 1996. V. 98. P. 193-197.
19. Machado M.A., Coletta Filho H.D., Targon M.L.P.N., Pompeu J.J. Genetic relationship of Mediterranean mandarins (Citrus deliciosa Tenore) using RAPD markers // Euphytica. 1996. V. 92. P. 321-326.
20. Coletta Filho H.D., Machado M.A., Targon M.L.P.N. et al. Analysis of the genetic diversity among mandarins (Citrus ssp.) using RAPD markers // Euphytica. 1998. V. 102. P. 133-139.
21. Nicolosi E., Deng Z.N., Gentile A. et al. Cytrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers // Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000. V. 100. P. 1155-1166.
22. Kaundun S.S., Zhyvoloup A., Park Y.-G. Evaluation of the genetic diversity among elite tea (Camellia sinensis var. sinensis) accessions using RAPD markers // Euphytica. 2000. V. 115. P. 7-16.
23. Fiedler J., Bufler G., Bangerth F. Genetic relationships of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) using RAPD markers // Euphytica. 1998. V. 101. P. 249-255.
24. Agwanda C.O., Lashermes P., Trouslot P. et al. Identification of RAPD markers for resistance to coffee berry disease, Colletotrichum kahawae, in arabica coffee // Euphytica. 1997. V. 97. P. 241-248.
25. Iketani H. Classification of fruit trees - what is the problem? What is important? // J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1998. V. 67. No 6. P. 1193-1196.
26. Edwards K., Jonstone C., Thompson C. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis // Nucl. Acids Res. 1991. V. 19. No 6. P. 1349.
27. Dorokhov D., Kloke E. Rapid of RAPD analyses of plant genome and nature of the RAPD spectra / German-Russian Cooper. Biotechnology. Workshop lv // Plant Molec. Biol., Genetics and Biotechnology. 1996. P. 34.
28. MAFF (1999). Procedures for the assessment of distinctness, uniformity and stability in varieties of apple trees. Ministry of Agriculture. Fisheries and Food. Plant Varieties Right Office, Cambridge. P. 24.
29. Nei M., Li V. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1976. V. 76. No 10. P. 5269-5273.
30. Hokanson S.C., Lamboy W.F., Szewc-McFadden A.K., McFerson J.R. Microsatellite (SSR) variation in a collection of Malus (apple) species and hybrids // Euphytica. 2001. V. 118. P. 281-294.
31. Rehder A. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. N.Y.: MacMillan, 1940. P. 389-399.
32. Korban S.S., Skirvin R.M. Nomenclature of the cultivated apple // HortScience. 1984. V. 19. P. 177-180.
33. Dunemann F., Kahnau R., Schmidt H. Genetic relationships in Malus evaluated by RAPD "fingerprinting" of cultivars and wild species // Plant Breeding. 1994. V. 113. P. 150-159.