Remote sensing of capelin and other biological features in the North Pacific using lidar and video technology

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1120-1130

  Brown, Evelyn D ^a   Churnside, James H ^b   Collins, Richard L ^a   Veenstra, Tim ^c   Wilson, James J ^b   Abnett, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Airborne Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial survey; Capelin; Lidar; Mallotus villosus; Ocean colour; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

AERIAL SURVEY; FISH; LIDAR; REMOTE SENSING;

PACIFIC OCEAN;

MALLOTUS VILLOSUS;

EID: 0036775494     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1282     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aglen, A., and Misund, O. A. 1990. Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic sampling trawling. ICES CM 1990/B: 38.
2. Barange, M., and Hampton, I. 1997. Spatial structure of co-occurring anchovy and sardine populations from acoustic data: Implications for survey design. Fisheries Oceanography, 6: 94-108.
3. Churnside, J. H., and McGillivary, P. A. 1991. Optical properties of several Pacific fishes. Applied Optics, 30: 2925-2927.
4. Churnside, J. H., Sawada, K., and Okumura, T. 2001b. A comparison of airborne lidar and echo sounder performance in fisheries. Journal of the Marine Acoustical Society of Japan, 28: 49-61.
5. Churnside, J. H., Tatarskii, V. V., and Wilson, J. J. 1998. Oceanic attenuation coefficients and signal fluctuations measured from a ship in the southern California Bight. Applied Optics, 37: 3105-3112.
6. Churnside, J. H., Wilson, J. J., and Tatarskii, V. V. 1997. Lidar profiles of fish schools. Applied Optics, 36: 6011-6020.
7. Churnside, J. H., Wilson, J. J., and Tatarskii, V. V. 2001a. An airborne lidar for fisheries applications. Optical Engineering, 40: 406-414.
8. Cram, D. L., and Hampton, I. 1976. A proposed aerial/acoustic strategy for pelagic fish stock assessment. Journal du Conseil International pour L'Exploration de la Mer, 37: 91-97.
9. Fiedler, P. C. 1978. The precision of simulated transect surveys of northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, school groups. Fishery Bulletin U.S., 76: 679-685.
10. Gordon, H. R. 1982. Interpretation of airborne oceanic lidar: Effects of multiple scattering. Applied Optics, 21: 2996-3001.
11. Hoge, F. E., Berry, R. E., and Swift, R. N. 1988. Active-passive airborne ocean color measurement. 1. Instrumentation. Applied Optics, 25: 39-47.
12. Hunter, J. R., and Churnside, J. M. 1995. Airborne fishery assessment technology: A NOAA workshop report. NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center Administrative Report, La Jolla, California, LJ-95-02. 71 pp.
13. Krekova, M. M., Krekov, G. M., Samkhvalov, I. V., and Shamanaev, V. S. 1994. Numerical evaluation of the possibilities of remote laser sensing of fish schools. Applied Optics, 33: 5715-5720.
14. Lewis, G. D., Jordan, D. L., and Roberts, P. J. 1999. Backscattering target detection in a turbid medium by polarization discrimination. Applied Optics, 38: 3937-3944.
15. Lo, N. C. H., Hunter, J. R., and Churnside, J. H. 2000. Modeling statistical performance of an airborne lidar survey system for anchovy. Fishery Bulletin U.S., 98: 264-282.
16. Logerwell, E. A., and Hargreaves, N. B. 1996. The distribution of sea birds relative to their fish prey off Vancouver Island: Opposing results at large and small spatial scales. Fisheries Oceanography, 5: 163-175.
17. Maffione, R. A. 2001. Evolution and revolution in measuring ocean optical properties. Oceanography, 14: 9-14.
18. Mitra, K., and Churnside, J. H. 1999. Transient radiative transfer equation applied to oceanographic lidar. Applied Optics, 38: 889-895.
19. Murphree, D. L., Taylor, C. D., and McClendon, R. W. 1974. Mathematical modeling for the detection of fish by an airborne laser. Journal of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 12: 1686-1692.
20. Olsen, K. 1990. Fish behaviour and acoustic sampling. Rapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions du Conseil International pour l' Exploration de la Mer, 189: 147-158.
21. Petitgas, P. 1993. Use of disjunctive kriging to model areas of high pelagic fish density in acoustic fisheries surveys. Aquatic Living Resources, 6: 201-209.
22. Shaw, J. A., Cimini, D., Westwater, E. R., Han, Y., Zorn, H. M., and Churnside, J. H. 2001. Scanning infrared radiometer for measuring the air-sea temperature difference. Applied Optics, 40: 4807-4815.
23. Simmonds, E. J., and Fryer, R. J. 1996. Which is better, random or systematic acoustic surveys? A simulation using North Sea herring as an example. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 39-50.
24. Squire, J. L., and Krumboltz, H. 1981. Profiling pelagic fish schools using airborne optical lasers and other remote sensing techniques. Journal of the Marine Technology Society, 15(4): 27-31.
25. Thompson, S. K. 1992. Sampling, pp. 176-204. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. Viihjálmsson, H. 1994. The Icelandic capelin stock. Rit Fiskideildar, 13: 281 pp.
27. Zorn, H. M., Churnside, J. H., and Oliver, C. W. 2000. Laser safety thresholds for cetaceans and pinnipeds. Marine Mammal Science, 16: 186-200.