Induce or not induce labor in gestational diabetes;Les indications obstétricales dans le diabète gestationnel: Déclencher ou ne pas déclencher

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2002, Pages

  Fournie A ^a   Le Digabel, J F ^a   Biquard, F ^a   Vasseur, C ^a   Gillard, P ^a   Descamps, P ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Abdominal circumference; Gestational diabetes; Induction of labor; Macrosomia; Shoulder dystocia

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIABETES CONTROL; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART SEPTUM DEFECT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS;

BIRTH INJURIES; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; PREGNANCY; SHOULDER;

EID: 0036774369     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (76)

1. Recommandations. Le diabète gestationnel. Diabetes and Metabolism 1997; 23: 9-14.
2. nd Edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1995: 251
3. Pedersen JF, Molsted-Pedersen N L. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in diabetic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 475-8.
4. Langer O, Koslowski S, Brustman L. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Israel J Med Sciences 1991; 27: 516-23.
5. Carlottil N, Moquet PY, Foucher F, Laurent MC, Maugendre D, Grail JY. Le diabète gestationnel: Étude rennaise. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2000; 29: 403-8.
6. Garcia-Patterson A, Corcoy R, Balsells SM, Altirriba O, Adelantado JM, Cabero L, et al. In pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus and intensive therapy, perinatal outcome is worse in small-for-gestational-age newborns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 481-5.
7. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SR The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996; 276: 1480-6.
8. Rouse DJ, Owen J. Prophylactic caesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography. A Faustian bargain? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 332-8.
9. Rouse DJ, Owen J. Sonography, suspected macrosomia, and prophylactic cesarean: A limited partnership. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 326-34.
10. Dildy GA, Clark SL. Shoulder dystocia: Risk identification. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 265-82.
11. Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 476-80.
12. Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic women. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 10-3.
13. Cohen BF, Penning S, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymmetry in patients with diabetes. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 197-201.
14. Romoff A. Shoulder dystocia: Lessons from the past and emerging concepts. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 226-35.
15. Sacks DA, Chen W. Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55: 229-39.
16. Neiger R. Fetal macrosomia in the diabetic patient. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 35: 138-50.
17. Lipscomb KR, Gregory K, Shaw K. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4,500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 558-64.
18. McLaren R, Puckett JL, Chauhan SP. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: A comparison of seven sonographic models. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 565-9.
19. Hadlock FR, Harrist RB, Fearneyhough TC, Deter RL, Park SK, Rossavik IK. Use of femur length/abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus. Radiology 1985; 154: 503-5.
20. Hirata GI, Medearis AL, Horenstein J, Bear RMB, Platt LD. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 238-42.
21. Landon MB. Prenatal diagnosis of macrosomia in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 52-4.
22. Alsulyman OM, Ouzounian JG, Kjos SL. The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 17: 503-6.
23. Roberts AB, Mitchell J, Murphy C, Koya H, CundyT. Fetal liver length in diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1308-14.
24. Kehl RJ, Krew MA, Thomas A, Catalano PM. Fetal growth and fetal body composition in infants of women with diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med 1996; 5: 273-80.
25. Bernstein I, Catalano PM. Fetal body composition and ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 558.
26. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, Boyd JM, Joiner J, Hendrix NW. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 639-42.
27. Crane SS, Avallone DA, Thomas AJ, Catalano PM. Sonographic estimation of fetal body composition with gestational diabetes mellitus at term. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 849-54.
28. Yoong WC. Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 274.
29. Holcomb Jr WL, Mostello DJ, Gray DL. Abdominal circumference vs estimated weight to predict large for gestational age birth weight in diabetic pregnancy. J Clinical Imaging 2000; 24: 1-7.
30. Smith GCS, Smith MFS, Mc Nay MB, Fleming JEE. The relation between: Fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: Findings in 3,512 pregnancies. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 186-90.
31. Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Sidiqui TA. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: Is there an optimum formula to predict diabetis fetal macrosomia? J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 55-61.
32. Pedersen JF, Molsted-Pedersen L. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in diabetic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 475-8.
33. Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Pan WH, Vaisrub N. Ultrasonic fetal circumference: Comparison of direct versus calculated measurement. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 833-5.
34. Al-Inanih H, Alaa N, Momtaz M, Badii MA. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: Accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2001; 51: 116-9.
35. Jazayeri A, Heffron JA, Phillips R, Spellacy WN. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 523-6.
36. Gilby JR, Williams MC, Spellacy WN. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 936-8.
37. Cohen BF, Penning S, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymetry in patients with diabetes. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 197-201.
38. Miller JM, Brown HL, Pastorek II JG, Gabert HA. Fetal overgrowth Diabetic versus nondiabetic. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7: 577-9.
39. Mintz MC, Landon MB, Gabbe SG, Madnelli DL, Ludmir J, Grumbach K, et al. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 240-3.
40. Verspyck E, Goffinet F, Hellot MF, Milliez J, Marpeau L. Newborn shoulder width: A prospective study of 2,222 consecutive measurements. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 589-93.
41. Schoenfeld A, Hod M, Friedman S, Ovadia J, Merlob P. The fetus of the diabetic mother: Growth, malformations and methods of surveillance by ultrasonography. The Beilinson Medical Center experience. Isr J Med Sciences 1991; 27: 532-40.
42. Landon MB, Sonek J, Foy P, Hamilton L, Gabbe SG. Sonographic measurement of fetal humeral soft tissue thickness in pregnancy complicated by GDM. Diabetes 1991; 40 (suppll 2): 66-70.
43. Petrikovsky BM, Oleschuk C, Lesser M, Gelertner N, Gross B. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 378-82.
44. Rigano S, Ferazzi E, Radaelli T, Taricco E, Cetin I, Pardi G. Sonographic measurements of subcutaneous fetal fat in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes and in normal pregnancies. Croatian Med J 2000; 41: 240-4.
45. Zelop CM. Prediction of fetal weight with the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 321-5.
46. Uotila J, Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Ryymin P, Punnonen R, Laasonen E. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 255-9.
47. Ogata ES, Sabbagha R, Metzger BE, Phelps RL, Depp R, Freinkel N. Serial ultrasonography to assess evolving fetal macrosomia. JAMA 1980; 243: 2405-8.
48. Hedriana HL, Moore TR. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonic examinations in predicting birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1600-6.
49. Landon MB, Mintz MC, Gabbe SG. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: Predictor of the large-for-gestationalage infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 115-21.
50. Keller JD, Metzger BE, Dooley SL, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Freinkel N. Infants of diabetic mothers with accelerated fetal growth by ultrasonography: Are they all alike? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 163: 893-7.
51. Bochner CJ, Medearis AL, Williams III J, Castro L, Hobel CJ, Wade ME. Early third trimester ultrasound screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 703-8.
52. Johnstone FD, Prescott RJ, Steel JM, Mao JH, Chambers S, Muir N. Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 747-54.
53. Wilkstrom I, Bergstrom R, Bakketeig L, Jacosen G, Lindmark G. Prediction of high birthweight from maternal characteristics, symphysis fundal height and ultrasound biometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 35: 27-33.
54. Chauhan SP, Cowan BD, Magann EF, Bradford TH, Roberts WE, Morrison JC. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 266-70.
55. Sokaol RJ, Chik L, Dombrovski MP, Zador IE. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: Improving ultrasonography-based prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1489-95.
56. Sylvestre G, Divon MY, Onyeije C, Fisher M. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: Combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing. J Matem-Fetal Med 2000; 9: 287-290.
57. Nasrat H, Fahgee W, Abalkhaid B, Yamani T, Ardawi MSM. Determinants of pregnancy outcome in patients with gestational diabetes. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996; 53: 117-23.
58. O'Reilly-Green C, Divon M. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 309-20.
59. Kjos SL, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA, Mestman JH. Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: A randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 611-5.
60. Dekker GA, Morris NH. Medical conditions associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In: Sibai BM, ed. Hypertensive Disorders in Women. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001: 85-110.
61. Conway DL, Langer O. Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: Reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 922-5.
62. nd Edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1995; 219-49.
63. La Marca E, Treisser A, De Greeter B, Pinget M. Cardiologie foetale chez la femme enceinte diabétique. Rev Prat (Paris) 1992; 42: 1387-9.
64. Cooper MJ, Enderlein MA, Tarnoff H, Roge CL. Asymetric septal hypertrophy in infants of diabetic mothers. Fetal echocardiography and the impact of maternal diabetic control. AJDC 1992; 146: 226-9.
65. Landon MB, Mintz MC, Gabbe SG. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: Predictor of the large-for-gestational age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 115-21.
66. Crequat J, Duyeme M, Brodaty G. Biométrie 2000. Tables de croissance foetale par le Collège fraņais d'échographie foetale (CFEF) et l'Inserm U 155. Gynécol Obstet Fertil 2000; 28: 435-45.
67. Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommandations of the fourth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: B161-7.
68. Leaphart WL, Meyer MC, Capeless EL. Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. J Mater Fetal Med 1997; 6: 99-102.
69. Gonen O, Rosen DJD, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov S, Fejgin MD. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 913-7.
70. Weeks JW, Pitman T, Spinatto II JA. Fetal macrosomia: Does antenatal prediction affects delivery route and birth outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1215-9.
71. Combs CA, Singh NB, Khoury JC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 492-6.
72. Levine AB, Lockwood CJ, Brown B, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: Does it make a difference? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 55-8.
73. Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Sykora K. Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance. Pathophysiology or practice style? JAMA 1996; 275: 1165-70.
74. Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HW, Michaelson J, Berry SM, Sorokin Y. Why are caesarean delivery rates so high in diabetic pregnancies? J Perinat Med 2000; 28: 316-20.
75. Hod M, Bar J, Peled Y, Fried S, Katz I, Itzhak M, et al. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998; 21 (suppl 2): B113-7.
76. Lurie S, Insler V, Hagay ZJ. Induction of labor at 38 to 39 weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia in gestational diabetic patients class A2. Am J Perinat 1996; 13: 293-6.