Ultrasound monitoring;Le suivi échographique

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2002, Pages

  Biquard, F ^a   Fournie A ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Abdominal circumference; Estimated fetal weight; Fetal macrosomia; Gestational diabetes; Interventricular septal hypertrophy

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; ECHOGRAPHY; FAT BODY; FETUS WEIGHT; HEART VENTRICLE SEPTUM DEFECT; HUMAN; MACROSOMIA; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FETAL WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0036774158     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Reece EA, Friedman AM, Copel J, Kleiman CS. Prenatal diagnosis and management of deviant fetal growth and congenital malformations. In Reece EA, Coustan DR, eds Churchill Livingstone: Second Edition Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy, 1995: 219-49.
2. La Marca E, Treisser A, de Geeter B, Pinget M. Cardiologie fœtale chez la femme enceinte diabétique: Importance de la surveillance 6chographique. Rev Prat 1992; 42: 1387-9.
3. Jeaggi ET, Fouron JC, Proulx F. Fetal cardiac performance in uncomplicated and well controlled maternel type 1 diabetes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 311-5.
4. Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: Is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia? J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 55-61.
5. Kehl RJ, Krew MA, Thomas A, Catalano P. Fetal growth and body composition in infants of women with diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med 1996; 5: 273-80.
6. Gilby JR, Williams MC, Spellacy WN. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 936-8.
7. Al-Inany H, Alaa N, Momtaz M, Badii MA. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: Accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2001; 51: 116-9.
8. Abramowicz JS, Robischon K and Cox C. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 409-13.
9. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, Boyd JM, Joiner J, Hendrix NW. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 639-42.
10. O'Reilly-Green C, Divon M. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 309-20.
11. Landon MB. Prenatal diagnostis of macrosomia in pregnancy complicated by diabetus mellitus. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 52-4.
12. Mintz MC, Landon MB, Gabbe SG, Marinelli DL, Ludmir J, Grumbach K, et al. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 240-3.
13. Zelop CM. Prediction of fetal weight with the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 321-5.