Development and validation of a web-based screening tool for monitoring cognitive status

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 458-476

  Erlanger, David M ^a,c   Kaushik, Tanya ^a   Broshek, Donna ^b   Freeman, Jason ^b   Feldman, Daniel ^a   Festa, Joanne ^a  

^a HeadMinder Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive testing; Computerized assessment; Internet testing; Neuropsychology; Reliable change index

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADOLESCENT; HEALTH STATUS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; TELEMETRY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0036773843     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200210000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Salinsky MC, Storzbach D, Dodrill CB, Binder LM. Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12-16 week period. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:597-605.
2. Hinton-Bayre A, Geffen G, Geffen L, McFarland K, Friis P. Concussion in contact sports: Reliable change indices of impairment and recovery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21:70-86.
3. Spreen O, Strauss E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests, 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
4. Matarazzo JD, Herman DO. Base rate data for the WAIS-R: Test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984;6:351-366.
5. Heaton RK, Temkin N, Dikmen S, et al. Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;16:75-91.
6. Erlanger DM, Feldman D, Kutner K, et al. Development and validation of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol for sports-related return-to-play decision-making. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. In press.
7. McCaffrey R, Duff K, Westervelt H. Practitioner's Guide to Evaluating Change with Neuropsychological Assessment Instruments. New York: Kluwer Press; 2000.
8. Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders H, Sedlak J, Awad IA. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology. 1993;7:41-52.
9. Hermann BP, Perrine K, Chelune GJ, et al. Visual confrontation naming following left anterior temporal lobectomy: A comparison of surgical approaches. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:3-9.
10. Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Peterson J, Leveroni C, Wyler AR. Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 1996;37:942-950.
11. Sawrie SM, Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders H. Empirical methods for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change following epilepsy surgery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996;2:556-564.
12. Erlanger D, Saliba E, Barth J, Almquist J, Weberight W, Freeman J. Monitoring resolution of post-concussion symptoms in athletes: Preliminary results of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol. J Athletic Training. 2001;36:280-287.
13. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psych. 1991;59:12-19.
14. Temkin NR, Heaton RK, Grant I, Dikmen SS. Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999;5:357-369.
15. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.
16. Randolph C. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
17. Powell D, Kaplan E, Whitla D, Weintraub S, Catlin R, Funkenstein H. MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace; 1993.
18. Kane R. MircoCog: A review. Bull Natl Acad Neuropsychol. 1995;11:13-16.
19. Erlanger D, Feldman D. Cognitive Stability Index™. New York: HeadMinder, Inc; 1999.
20. Lezak MD. Neuropsychol Assessment, 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford Press; 1995.
21. Erlanger D, Festa J. Cognitive Status Exam™. New York: HeadMinder, Inc; 2001.
22. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
23. Levin HS, Benton AL, Grossman RG. Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury. London: Oxford University Press; 1982.
24. Barth JT, Macciocchi SN, Boll TJ, Giordani B, Jane JA, Rimel RW. Neuropsychological sequelae of minor head injury. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:529-533.
25. Barth JT, Alves WA, Ryan T, et al. Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AR, eds. Mild Head Injury. New York: Oxford Press; 1989:529-533.
26. Barkley RA. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
27. Cummings JL, Benson FD. Dementia: A Clinical Approach. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann Medical; 1992.