-
1
-
-
0028812717
-
A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter study comparing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Puregon vs Metrodin) in in-vitro fertilization
-
Out HJ, Mannaerts BMJL, Driessen SG, Coelingh Bennink HJ: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter study comparing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Puregon vs Metrodin) in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2534-2540
-
(1995)
Hum Reprod
, vol.10
, pp. 2534-2540
-
-
Out, H.J.1
Mannaerts, B.M.J.L.2
Driessen, S.G.3
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.4
-
2
-
-
0031917126
-
The use of a 100 IU starting dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in in-vitro fertilization
-
Devroey P, Tournaye H, van Steirteghem A, Hendrix P, Out HJ: The use of a 100 IU starting dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:565-566
-
(1998)
Hum Reprod
, vol.13
, pp. 565-566
-
-
Devroey, P.1
Tournaye, H.2
Van Steirteghem, A.3
Hendrix, P.4
Out, H.J.5
-
3
-
-
0032997924
-
A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to study the efficacy and efficiency of a fixed dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation
-
Out HJ, Lindenberg S, Mikkelsen AL, Eldar-Geva T, Healy DL, Leader A, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pellicer A: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to study the efficacy and efficiency of a fixed dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 1999;14:622-627
-
(1999)
Hum Reprod
, vol.14
, pp. 622-627
-
-
Out, H.J.1
Lindenberg, S.2
Mikkelsen, A.L.3
Eldar-Geva, T.4
Healy, D.L.5
Leader, A.6
Rodriguez-Escudero, F.J.7
Garcia-Velasco, J.A.8
Pellicer, A.9
-
4
-
-
0034969673
-
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial using fixed daily doses of 100 or 200 IU of recombinant FSH in ICSI cycles
-
Out HJ, David I, Ron-El R, Friedler S, Shalev E, Geslevich J, Dor J, Shulman A, Ben-Rafael Z, Fisch B, Dirnfeld M: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial using fixed daily doses of 100 or 200 IU of recombinant FSH in ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1104-1109
-
(2001)
Hum Reprod
, vol.16
, pp. 1104-1109
-
-
Out, H.J.1
David, I.2
Ron-El, R.3
Friedler, S.4
Shalev, E.5
Geslevich, J.6
Dor, J.7
Shulman, A.8
Ben-Rafael, Z.9
Fisch, B.10
Dirnfeld, M.11
-
5
-
-
0025010886
-
Good Clinical Practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community
-
CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products: Good Clinical Practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community. Pharmacol Toxicol 1990;67:361-372
-
(1990)
Pharmacol Toxicol
, vol.67
, pp. 361-372
-
-
-
6
-
-
41049093347
-
The combination of estimates from different experiments
-
Cochran WG: The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;10:101-129
-
(1954)
Biometrics
, vol.10
, pp. 101-129
-
-
Cochran, W.G.1
-
7
-
-
0000642942
-
Some methods for strengthening the common tests
-
Cochran WG: Some methods for strengthening the common tests. Biometrics 1954;10:417-451
-
(1954)
Biometrics
, vol.10
, pp. 417-451
-
-
Cochran, W.G.1
-
8
-
-
0029868629
-
High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome
-
Land JA, Yarmolinskaya MI, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH: High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1996;65:961-965
-
(1996)
Fertil Steril
, vol.65
, pp. 961-965
-
-
Land, J.A.1
Yarmolinskaya, M.I.2
Dumoulin, J.C.M.3
Evers, J.L.H.4
-
9
-
-
0027457295
-
Doubling the human menopausal gonadotrophin dose in the course of an in-vitro fertilization treatment cycle in low responders: A randomized study
-
van Hooff MHA, Alberda AT, Huisman GJ, Zeilmaker GH, Leerentveld RA: Doubling the human menopausal gonadotrophin dose in the course of an in-vitro fertilization treatment cycle in low responders: A randomized study. Hum Reprod 1993;8:369-373
-
(1993)
Hum Reprod
, vol.8
, pp. 369-373
-
-
Van Hooff, M.H.A.1
Alberda, A.T.2
Huisman, G.J.3
Zeilmaker, G.H.4
Leerentveld, R.A.5
-
10
-
-
1842371504
-
Cryopreservation: The practicalities of evaluation
-
Jones HW Jr, Out HJ, Hoomans EHM, Driessen SGAJ, Coelingh Bennink HJT: Cryopreservation: The practicalities of evaluation. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1522-1524
-
(1997)
Hum Reprod
, vol.12
, pp. 1522-1524
-
-
Jones H.W., Jr.1
Out, H.J.2
Hoomans, E.H.M.3
Driessen, S.G.A.J.4
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.5
-
11
-
-
0030793181
-
Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin beta, Puregon) yields higher pregnancy rates in vitro fertilization than urinary gonadotropins
-
Out HJ, Driessen SGAJ, Mannaerts BMJL, Coelingh Bennink HJT: Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin beta, Puregon) yields higher pregnancy rates in vitro fertilization than urinary gonadotropins. Fertil Steril 1997;68:138-142
-
(1997)
Fertil Steril
, vol.68
, pp. 138-142
-
-
Out, H.J.1
Driessen, S.G.A.J.2
Mannaerts, B.M.J.L.3
Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.4
-
12
-
-
0030016188
-
Premature luteinization in in vitro fertilization cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH-a and urinary FSH
-
Ubaldi F, Camus M, Smitz J, Coelingh Bennink H, van Steirteghem A, Devroey P: Premature luteinization in in vitro fertilization cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH-a and urinary FSH. Fertil Steril 1996;66:275-280
-
(1996)
Fertil Steril
, vol.66
, pp. 275-280
-
-
Ubaldi, F.1
Camus, M.2
Smitz, J.3
Coelingh Bennink, H.4
Van Steirteghem, A.5
Devroey, P.6
-
13
-
-
0033963346
-
Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone Puregon does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation
-
Out HJ, Braat DDM, Lintsen BME, Gurgan T, Bukulmez O, Gokmen O, Keles G, Caballero P, Gonzalez JM, Fabregues F, Balasch J, Roulier R: Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone Puregon does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 2000;15:29-35
-
(2000)
Hum Reprod
, vol.15
, pp. 29-35
-
-
Out, H.J.1
Braat, D.D.M.2
Lintsen, B.M.E.3
Gurgan, T.4
Bukulmez, O.5
Gokmen, O.6
Keles, G.7
Caballero, P.8
Gonzalez, J.M.9
Fabregues, F.10
Balasch, J.11
Roulier, R.12
|