Evidence-based practice guidelines: Not all evidence is created equal

Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2002, Pages

  Wertz, Robert T ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0036771246     PISSN: 10651438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. American Academy of Neurology (1994). Assessment: Melodic intonation therapy. Neurology, 44, 566-568.
2. Birch & Davis Associates, Inc. (1997). The state-of-the science: Medical rehabilitation. Falls Church, VA: Birch & Davis Associates, Inc.
3. Clarke, M., & Oxman, A. (Eds.) (2001). Cochrane review handbook 4.1.3. Oxford: Update Software. Updated Quarterly.
4. Office of Technology Assessment (1978). Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. OTA-H-75. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
5. Robey, R. R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 172-187.
6. Robey, R. R., & Schultz, M. (1998). A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: An adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology, 12, 787-810.
7. Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1998). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
8. Wertz, R. T., & Irwin, W. H. (2001). Darley and the efficacy of language rehabilitation in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 231-247.