Use of telemetry in the development and application of biological criteria for habitat hydraulic modeling

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 483, Issue , 2002, Pages 71-82

  Scruton, D A ^a   Clarke, K D ^a   Ollerhead, L M N ^a   Perry, D ^b   McKinley, R S ^b   Alfredsen, K ^c   Harby, A ^c  

^a FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

Atlantic salmon; Habitat hydraulic modeling; Habitat preferences; Radio telemetry; River flows

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; RADIO TRANSMITTERS; RIVERS; TELEMETERING;

WEIGHTED USABLE AREAS (WUA);

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

FLOW REGULATION; HABITAT SELECTION; MODELING; RIVER FLOW; SALMONID; TELEMETRY;

CANADA;

SALMO; SALMO SALAR; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0036767493     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021302823267     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Adams, N. S., D. W. Rondorf, S. D. Evans, J. E. Kelly & R. W. Perry, 1998. Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 55: 781-787.
2. Anderson, W. G., R. S. McKinley & M. Colvecchia, 1997. The use of clove oil as an anesthetic for rainbow trout and its effects on swimming performance, N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 17: 301-307.
3. Bain, M. B. & J. T. Finn, 1991. Analysis of microhabitat use by fish: Investigator effect and investigator bias. Rivers 2: 57-65.
4. Bovee, K. D., 1978. Probability-of-use criteria for the family Salmonidae. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-78/07.
5. Bovee, K. D., 1982. A guide to stream analysis using the Instroam Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12, FWS/OBS-82/86: 248 pp.
6. Bovee, K. D., 1988. Use of the the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology to evaluate influences of microhabitat variability on trout populations in four Colorado streams. Ann. Conf. West. Ass. Fish Wild. Agencies 6: 227-257.
7. Bovee, K. D. & T. Cochnauer, 1977. Development and evaluation of weighted criteria probability-of-use curves for instream flow assessments: fisheries. Instream Flow Information Paper 3. FWS/OBS-77/63: 39 pp.
8. Bunt, C. M., S. J. Cooke, C. Katopodis & R. S. McKinley, 1999. Movement and summer habitat of brown trout (Salmo trutta) below a pulsed discharge hydroelectric generating station. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 15: 395-403.
9. Cooke, S. J. & C. M. Bunt, 2001. Assessment of internal and external antenna configurations of radio transmitters implanted in smallmouth bass. North Am. J. Fish. Mgmt. 21: 236-241.
10. Fausch, K. D., 1984, Profitable stream positions for salmonids relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can. J. Zool. 62: 441-451.
11. Ghanem, A. H., P. M. Steffler, F. E. Hicks & C. Katopodis, 1996. Two dimensional finite element flow modeling of physical fish habitat. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 12: 185-200.
12. Gowan, C., M. K. Young, K. D. Fausch & S. C. Riley, 1994. Restricted movement in resident stream salmonids: a paradigm lost? Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 2626-2637.
13. Heggenes, J., 1988. Effects of short-term flow fluctuations on displacement of, and habitat use by, brown trout in a small stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 117: 336-344.
14. Kondolf, G. M., E. W. Larsen & J. G. Williams, 2000. Measuring and modeling the hydraulic environment for assessing instream flows. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgmt 20: 1016-1028.
15. Milhous, R. T., 1990. Instream habitat considering hydro-peaking. In Khanbilvardi, R. M. & T. C. Gooch (eds), Optimizing the Resources for Water Management. Proceedings of the 17th Annual National Conference: 593-598.
16. Morrison, H. A. & K. E. Smokorowski, 2000. The application of various frameworks and models for assessing the effects of hydropeaking on the productivity of aquatic systems. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. aquat. Sci. 2322: x+57 pp.
17. Nehring, R. B. & R. M. Anderson, 1993. Determination of population-limiting critical salmonid habitats in Colorado streams using the Physical Habitat Simulation System. Rivers 4: 1-19.
18. Niemela, S. L., J. B. Layzer & J. A. Gore, 1993. An improved radiotelemetry method for determining microhabitats by fishes, Rivers 4: 30-35.
19. Olsen, N. R. & S. Stotseth, 1995. Three dimensional numeric modeling of water flow in a river with large bed roughness. IAHR J. Hydr. Res. 33: 571-581.
20. Orth, D. J., 1987. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow habitat models. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt 1: 171-181.
21. Orth, D. J. & O. E. Maughan, 1982. Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 111: 413-445.
22. Parasiewicz, P. & M. J. Dunbar, 2001. Physical habitat modeling for fish - a developing approach. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 135/2: 239-258.
23. Perry, D. M., 2001. Use of telemetry to assess the effect of change in river discharge on the development and application of habitat suitability criteria for use in habitat hydraulic modeling. Masters of Science Thesis, Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo Ontario: 80 pp.
24. Pert, E. J. & D. C. Erman, 1994. Habitat use by adult rainbow trout under moderate artificial fluctuations in flow. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 123: 913-923.
25. Pert, E. J. & D. J. Orth, 1999. Microscale variation in hydraulic habitat for juvenile rainbow trout. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Ecohydraulics (CD-ROM), Salt Lake City, Utah.
26. Rincon, P. A. & J. Lobon-Cervia, 1993. Microhabitat use by stream-resident brown trout: bioenergetic consequences. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122: 575-587.
27. Scott, D. & C. S. Shirvell, 1987. A critique of Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and observations on flow determination in New Zealand. In Craig, J. F. & J. B. Kemper (eds), Regulated Streams: Advances in Ecology. Plenum Press, New York: 27-43.
28. Scruton, D. A. & R. J. Gibson, 1995. Quantitative electrofishing in Newfoundland: Results of workshops to review current methods and recommend standardization of techniques. Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2308, vii+148 pp., 4 appendices.
29. Scruton, D. A., J. Heggenes, S. Valentin, A. Harby & T. H. Bakken, 1998. Field sampling design and spatial scale in habitat hydraulic modelling: Comparison of three models. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 5: 225-240.
30. Shirvell, C. S., 1986. Pitfalls of Physical Habitat Simulation in Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. aquat. Sci. 1460: 74 pp.
31. Steele, R. J. & K. E. Smokorowski, 2000. Review of literature related to the downstream ecological effects of hydroelectric power generation. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. aquat. Sci. 2334, v+55 pp.
32. Tennant, D. L., 1975. Instream Flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Billings Montana: 30 pp.
33. Tyus, H. M., B. D. Burdick & C. W. McAdam, 1984. Use of radio telemetry for obtaining preference data on Colorado squaw fish. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgmt 4: 177-180.