Prosecuting for environmental crime: Does crime pay?

Environmental Law and Management

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 289-295

  Malcolm, Rosalind ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIME; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; LEGAL SYSTEM; LIABILITY; POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE;

EID: 0036766679     PISSN: 10676058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. House of Commons Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee, Sixth Report. The Environment Agency, HC 34-1 (Session 1999-2000).
2. A Ogus and C Abbot, 'Sanctions for Pollution: Do We Have The Right Regime?' (2002) 14 JEL 283.
3. R Navarro and D Stott. 'A Brief Comment: Sanctions for Pollution' (2002) 14 JEL 299.
4. Hawkins, Environment and Enforcement: The Social Definition of Pollution (OUP, 1984).
5. P de Prez, 'An Environmental Court: The Case for Inclusion of a Criminal Law Jurisdiction' ELM 12 [2000] 191;
6. P de Prez, 'Excuses, Excuses: The Ritual Trivialisation of Environmental Prosecutions' (2000) 12(1) JEL 65.
7. www.sentencing-advisory-panel.gov.uk.
8. Martin Davies, 'Sentencing for Environmental Offences' [2000] 2.
9. A Hobley and S Blackmore, 'Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the UK and EU compared: The Same Destination, Different Routes' [2002] 2.
10. A Hobley, 'Emissions Trading in the UK: An Overview' [2001].
11. J Alder and D Wilkinson, Environmental Law and Ethics (Macmillan, 1999).